My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04641
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04641
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:46:50 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:48:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Denver
Community
All
Stream Name
All
Basin
South Platte
Title
Proposed Hydrology for use in Hydraulic Analysis of FEMA Flood Studies and Restudies
Date
9/1/1989
Prepared For
State of Colorado
Prepared By
Resource Consultants
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />under AMC II conditions. Both used 3.5 inches as the rainfall <br />depth for the 100-year storm. In addition, the rCDB analyzed a <br />24-hour rainfall of 4.4 Inch depth under the same criteria. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The PCDB study was primarily concerned wIth development of PC <br />basin. Their detailed study was limited to analysis of <br />streamflow upstream of the PC culvert at Academy Boulevard <br />(point P8 on Figure 11.1). Flows cited in their report <br />downstr,eam of thIs point utilized the results of the older ESCC <br />without further analysis. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Peak discharge resul ts from the three studies are presented in <br />Table 11.1. The location points refer to hydrologic discharge <br />poInts on Figure 11.1. "Historic" values representing existing <br />condItions were derived by the PCDB to represent the baseline <br />condition; these are the values presented in the table. The <br />ESCC only analyzed flows for future, fully developed conditions <br />in the basin; the values presented here from theIr study <br />reflect that condition. <br /> <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />TABLE 11.1 " SUMMARY OF PC PEAK DISCHARGES FROM PREVIOUS REPORTS <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />REPORT AND DRAINAGE AREA PEAK DISCHARGES ~ <br />LOCATION i!,quare !!!1lill 10 YR 50 YR 100 YR 500 YR <br />Frs <br />Point PlO 9.70 2,300 5,500 7,600 15,400 <br />ESCC <br />Point P7a 3.61 3,768 <br />Point P8 5 . 00 ( 1) 2,560 <br />Point PI0 10.18(1) 8,273 <br />PCDB: 6-hr <br />Point P8 5.00 91.9 <br />PCDB: 24-hr <br />Point P8 5.00 1,252 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />In determining the hydrology for this study, the overall basIn <br />boundaries for both PC and PCT basins were kept nearly the same <br />as the PCDB and ESCC studies. Subbasin boundaries were <br />redefined as shown in Figure 11.1. <br /> <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />(1) No area w',s presented for PC basin In the ESCC; these areas are <br />based on the assumption of 5.0 square miles for the PC basin as used <br />by the PC DB and RCI. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />11.3 l~drologic Analysis <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The PC basin was assumed primarily undeveloped; the derived <br />soil curve numbers closely matched those used by the PCDB. <br />Lower portions of PCT were assumed fully developed. The upper <br />basins were assumed only partially developed as reflects <br />existing conditions. In particular, subbasins 'fl, T2, T3 and <br />T7 still have a fair amount of open space. New Tc values were <br />determined to reflect the existing development conditions. A <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1,8 <br /> <br />R€~OURC€ CON~UlTI\NT~ INC <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.