Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />8.2 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Colorado Springs as shown in Figure 8.1. rt borders three <br />other basins Included in this study: Sand Creek West Fork on <br />the west, Sand Creek East Fork Tributary on the East, and Sand <br />Creek Central Fork on the south. This long slender basin <br />extends from the Chicago Rock Island and Pacific Railroad 10 <br />ml.les to the north and is approximately 2 miles wide. <br /> <br /> <br />Total area of the drainage basin is 15.0 square miles. Slope <br />averages over a range of 3-4% in the northern area to 6-8% in <br />the south. the upper portion of the basin is presently <br />undeveloped. Residential development in the lower basin has <br />been extensive. <br /> <br />The channel consists primarIly of natural streambed in sandy <br />material. A small sectIon of the stream in the vicinity of <br />North Carefree CIrcle has been lIned with soIl cement. <br /> <br />Soils within the basin are a relatively even mix of "A" and "B" <br />type soils. The only exception is a small area along Powers <br />Boulevard near North Carefree Circle and extending north: "0" <br />soils exist there. <br /> <br />Two previous studies of the basin were available for review. <br />These were the FI.li -=- !;ill of Co lorado Sorin~s (Reference 6) and <br />Sand Creek Mftster Draina~~ Plannlnp- Study -=- City of Colorado <br />~g~. s.. E_ll'.asQ. County -=- DevllPoment of Alternate Plans <br />develop(~d by Simons, Li and Assoc., Ine. (SLA) in cooperation <br />with Finn & Associates, Ltd. (Reference 17, July 1985). <br /> <br />PrevIous Studies <br /> <br />Hydrology for the frS was based on an SCS flood hazard analysts <br />report (Reference 18) completed in 1973. According to the FIS, <br />this study utilized SCS methods to develop peak discharges for <br />condItions existing at that time. It is doubtful, given the <br />date of the study, that the effects of a Type IIA rainfall <br />distribution were included In the analysis. <br /> <br />The hydrologic analysis by SLA was performed in the same manner <br />as outlined for the West Fork of Sand Creek (see section 7 of <br />this report). For this watershed, however, the average area <br />used for subbasins was much smaller. <br /> <br />A summary of peak discharges from the previous studies is <br />presented in Table 8.1 <br /> <br />34 <br /> <br />R€~OURC€ CON~UlTI\NT~ INC <br />