My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04639
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04639
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:46:50 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:48:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Las Animas
Community
Trinidad
Stream Name
Pinon Canon Dam
Basin
Arkansas
Title
Pinon canaon Dam Flood Control
Date
10/1/1951
Prepared For
CWCB
Prepared By
COE
Floodplain - Doc Type
Project
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />>~ <br /> <br />. > Modified Conditions <br />Peak disehar-ge, <br />at ,Jillow St. bamage <br />(c.f.s,.) <br /> <br /> <br />.', .', <br />'l'OTAL DfJVJAGES. IN PERIOD OF' RECORD <br />.. P:I:lJONCi,NON l>F.ROYO :,T 'IRINIDI.D, COLORf,DO <br /> <br />rXLsting Conditions <br />Peak discharge. <br />at Willow St. Damage <br />(c.f.s.) . <br /> <br />l;)at.e of Flood <br /> <br />..,,'-r~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />'10 S~ 1918 <br />. p . <br />llA1ig i923. <br />. 22 Jul 1925 . <br />~4Jul 1925 <br />· ~j,ug'l929 <br />. 28 Sep 1936 <br />27 tun 1937 <br />8 Oc;t 1938 <br />13. jiuT941 <br />5 Se1'1944 <br />.. 13. Jul 1945. <br />.14 Jul1948 ..~' .' <br />25 jul1950 <br /> <br />670 <br />820 <br />1,350 <br />1,000 <br />1,350 <br />1,230 <br />670 <br />570 <br />730 <br />700 <br />1,350 . . <br />2,000 \ <br />1,570 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. Total. <br /> <br />Average annual damages <br />in 34-year period <br />(1918-1951) <br />Standard projeetflood. 2,250 <br />. . <br />Average annual damages <br />from occurrenee of <br />standard project <br />flood onee in 50 <br />years <br /> <br />'i'OTAL AVERAGE ANIlI'Uf.L. ,. <br />.nM1I\GES <br /> <br />(/800 <br />3,200 <br />25,000 <br />7,800 <br />25,000 <br />17,500 <br />800 <br /> <br />1,600 <br />1,200 <br />25,000 <br />.69,000 <br />40,000 <br /> <br />(~216, 900 <br /> <br />6,380 <br /> <br />85.500 <br /> <br />1,71,2 <br /> <br />. . <br />. ::)8,090 <br /> <br />IV - BENEFITS <br /> <br />N.F. <br />N.F. <br />670 <br />520 <br />670 <br />620 <br />N.F. <br />N.F. <br />N.F. <br />N.F. . <br />670 <br />960 <br />770 <br /> <br />.-- <br /> <br />()800 <br /> <br />800 <br />200 <br /> <br />800 <br />6,600 <br />2,300 <br /> <br />()l1,500 <br /> <br />340 <br /> <br />1,070 <br /> <br />10,300 <br /> <br />210 <br /> <br />,"0'5 <br />'i~'::;> 0 <br />. . <br /> <br />4-01. Prevel'tion of flood damages. - Ls shown in table 3, the <br />plan of improvement would not eliminatJ all damages that would be <br />caused by a repetition of the floods of record, nor would it afford <br /> <br />~(; <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />-5- <br /> <br />Appendix III <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.