My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04610
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04610
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:46:43 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:45:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Overview of River-Floodplain Ecology in the Upper Mississippi River Basin
Date
12/9/1996
Prepared By
USGS
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />CHAPTER 2: ECOLOGICAL OVERVIEW-POSTFLOOD RECOVERY AND ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT 23 <br /> <br />MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS <br /> <br />ACQUISITION AND PROTECTION OF <br />ECOLOGICALLY IMPORTANT HABITATS <br /> <br />Approximately half the floodplain in the Illinois River <br />(Mills and others, 1966: Bellrose and others, 1983) has been <br />drained and leveed. primarily for agriculture, as was much <br />of the floodplain of the upper Mississippi River and the <br />entire floodplain in the middle Mississippi River. In contrast <br />to the Minnesota and Wisconsin reaches of the UMRS. <br />where the U,S, Fish and Wildlife Refuge is concentrated. <br />the Illinois River and the rest of the UMRS have much more <br />area of agriculturally developed floodplains, Land acquisi- <br />tions should be encouraged, but some areas may offer better <br />potential for management than others. The ecology of newly <br />acquired areas should be intensively monitored to under- <br />stand and better manage the large river-floodplain ecosys- <br />tems. Monitoring should also identify management <br />problems in time to take corrective action. <br />Floodplain forests in the upper Mississippi River sys- <br />tem have been negatively affected by disruption of historic <br />hydrologic cycles, Mast-producing forest communities are <br />adapted to the hill and swale floodplain topography and are <br />distributed in relation to the average seasonal pattern of dry- <br />ing and flooding. While inundation by surface waters is an <br />important consideration, impoundment by navigation dams <br />has mised the water table. The result over the last 50 years is <br />the development of a dominance of silver maple (Nelson <br />and others. 1994), While it may be impossible to counteract <br />the effects on the water table. valuable forest resources may <br />be present in the upper pool reach of the navigation pools, <br />Tributary inflows provide highly diverse microhabitats <br />within the larger view of the river-floodplain ecosystem. <br />Their channels are dynamic and meander extensively <br />through the low-relief topography of the alluvial floodplain, <br />They suppon forest stands of great species diversity, hut <br />perhaps more imponant. they suppon variability in age <br />structure of a forest stand. Tributary channel migrations cut <br />banks and fell mature trees; the openings provide space for <br />new trees further away from the cut bank and on the oppo- <br />site bank. where depositional processes dominate. The <br />meandering tributaries also slow current velocities, allow- <br />ing sediments to drop out in stream or in tributary delta fans <br />that create new terrestrial habitats for colonization by young <br />trees, Many river-floodplain birds are dependent on forests <br />of varying age. Tributary streams should be sought out and <br />dechannelized to optimize the ecological diversity they can <br />provide, <br />Mesic prairies were once a major portion of the river- <br />floodplain ecosystem. bUlthey were the first areas to be <br />convened to agricultural fields (Nelson and others. 1994) <br />and therefore the first to be sequestered behind levees, The <br />highly productive prairie habitats provide seasonal energy <br />pulses to the river community when riverine fauna migrate <br /> <br />into the newly flooded habitat. The energy pathway begins <br />when plants are inundated and are colonized by microflora <br />and microfauna. Microbial energy is incorporated by inver- <br />tebrate detritivores and ultimately by venebrates of all <br />classes (fish. reptiles and amphibians. birds. mammals), The <br />mesic prairie community may survive best at midpool <br />reaches of the navigation pools because they may be more <br />tolerant of the raised water table and provide the energetic <br />benefits associated with flooding described above. <br />Deepwater wetland habitats are rare but important <br />components of the river-floodplain ecosystem. They sup- <br />port diverse populations of plants along an elevation gradi- <br />ent determined by river-floodplain geomorphology and <br />hydrology. Migratory birds and riverine fishes have evolved <br />behaviors adapted to seasonal hydrologic cycles that typi- <br />cally provide access to these habitats, Bimodal flooding in <br />the Mississippi River may panition availability of energy <br />resources (wetland plants), so that some summer production <br />is available to birds migrating south in the fall and another <br />ponion. higher on the floodplain. is available for birds <br />migrating nonh in the spring, Flooding also provides access <br />to off-channel habitats for riverine fish species adapted to <br />spawning. rearing. and overwintering in protected backwa- <br />ters (Welcomme. 1979; Bayley. 1991: Bodensteiner and <br />Lewis. 1992), These habitats (and side channels that some- <br />times exhibit backwater characteristics) have been severely <br />degraded by sedimentation. Large floodplain depressions. <br />oxbows. and historic side channels behind levees should be <br />considered for their potential wetland value, <br />The lower pool reach of the navigation pools provides <br />a hydrologically disturbed but potentially valuable habitat, <br />Waler-Ievel stability is maintained by the dam in a pool <br />managed with dam point control. This can reduce operating <br />costs for waterfowl management activities by eliminating <br />pumping costs when rewatering managed wetlands. It can <br />also provide greater hydrologic predictability. thereby <br />allowing beller refined water level management plans, It <br />may also be possible to use ground water to rewater the <br />areas in the fall. thereby reducing sedimentation by elimi- <br />nating turbid river water inputs, The impounded portion of <br />the navigation pool also provides the greatest opponunity <br />for recreational boating because of the predictability of <br />water levels. The most intensive management should be <br />concentrated in the most hydrologically disturbed ponions <br />of the pool. <br />Midpool floodplain habitats are valuable beca~se of <br />their potential to suppon wetland habitats. Changing control <br />points of pools regulated at mid pool would not only reduce <br />the negative impacts of drawdowns, it would also provide <br />more floodable acreage and greater energetic potential to <br />the river community. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.