My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04610
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04610
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:46:43 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:45:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Overview of River-Floodplain Ecology in the Upper Mississippi River Basin
Date
12/9/1996
Prepared By
USGS
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />CHAPTER 2: ECOLOGICAL OVERVIEW-POSTFLOOD RECOVERY AND ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT II <br /> <br />PRESENT <br /> <br />RIVER E!>;GINEERI!>;G <br /> <br />Early navigation improvements, including the 4- and <br />6-foot channel projects, proved inadequate for many com- <br />mercial shippers, In 1913 the first UMR lock and dam was <br />put into operation at Keokuk. Iowa, It was constructed by a <br />private firm and was one of the largest hydroelectric devel- <br />opments of its day. A minority group of waterway interests <br />fought unsuccessfully between then and the Roosevelt era <br />to create a reliable 9-fool navigation channel from 51. Louis, <br />Missouri, to St. Paul. Minnesota. There was significant <br />opposition to the project. but following the Great Depres- <br />sion, public works projects were passed by the U.S, Con- <br />gress with assistance from the White House (Hoops, 1993), <br />Thirty-five locks and dams were ultimately constructed dur- <br />ing the 1930's to help "revive" UMR navigation and create <br />jobs during Roosevelt.s New Deal era (figs, 2-1. 2-5), Sig- <br />nificant levee construction had occurred before this time <br />and continued concurrent with navigation improvements. <br />Floodplain habitats were being "reclaimed" at an alarming <br />rate (fig. 2-4). <br />The dams were designed to impound water to create a <br />9-foot navigable channel during low to moderate flow peri- <br />ods (fig, 2-5), Dams have some control over moderate <br />flooding but do not affect large floods, They are designed so <br />that the gates are either raised completely or lowered on the <br />lIlinois River during periods of high discharge. Mainte- <br />nance of artificially high water elevations. reduced current <br />velocity, and floodplain constriction all contributed to the <br />ecological degradation of the UMR (UMRBC. 1982; Bell- <br />rose and others. 1983; Grubaugh and Anderson, 1988; <br />Bhowmik and Adams, 1989), <br />Operation of the dams increased water-surface eleva- <br />tions in the lower and middle portions of the river reaches <br />commonly called "navigation pools," The tenn "pool" is <br />misleading because it implies that the river is impounded <br />like a reservoir, when in fact it is still riverlike in fonn and <br />function. Navigation dams did, however, increase low-flow <br />elevations and created three hydrologically distinguishable <br />regions within the reach between two dams. Three regions <br />are loosely defined as "upper pool" (upstream one-third to <br />one-half of a reach). "midpool" (middle half to two-thirds of <br />a reach), and "lower pool" (downstream one-third to one- <br />half) (Fremling and others. 1989), Upper pool reaches retain <br />most of their predam hydrologic characteristics and contain <br />narrow channels. The midpool reach shows effects from <br />downstream impoundment (i.e.. increased low-flow water- <br />surface elevations), but the upstream end responds more <br />naturally to hydrologic events, acting as a transitional zone <br />between the upper and lower pool reaches, The lower pool <br />reach is the most hydrologically disturbed, Dams have cre- <br />ated large open-water areas ("impoundments") over what <br />was once productive floodplain habitat (fig. 2...{j). <br /> <br />Pooled reaches of the Mississippi River exhibit hydro- <br />logic zonation in relation to their proximity to the impound- <br />ing dam and floodplain gradient. The relations under three <br />levels of control are shown in figure 2-7. In unregulated <br />river systems. lateral expansion is determined by floodplain <br />topography and relief, In general. dam point control creates <br />the hydrologic condition described above, <br />The same low-flow pool shape is maintained on pools <br />controlled at a midpool control point. but an additional <br />hydrologic/ecological perturbation occurs during moderate <br />flows. Water releases are increased with flow to moderate <br />flooding at midpool reaches, The result is reduced flooding <br />in midpool reaches and lower pool drawdowns that leave <br />shallow backwater and channel border habitats exposed <br />(fig, 2-8), The timing of drawdowns is especially detrimen- <br />tal because riverine organisms are adapted to flooding dur- <br />ing seasonal periods of high discharge. Drawdowns reduce <br />habitat availability during spring floods. when floodplain <br />resources are most critical to successful reproduction and <br />growth of river fauna. <br />At some level of high discharge. all dams go to "open <br />river" (fig, 2-7). where they have no influence on the river <br />at all. There is some leeway between open river and severe <br />flooding because of dam placement on the floodplain and <br />structural flood protection measures (levees). Most dams. <br />except Lock and Dam 19. operate under open-river condi- <br />tions for some part of each year because they are intended to <br />augment navigation at low to moderate flow only. <br />Navigation dams have a highly visible impact on the <br />river. but other, less obvious. impacts have also occurred. In <br />the middle Mississippi River. huge levees constricted the <br />floodplain. and channel training structures eroded the river- <br />bed. In the Illinois River. water diversions from Lake Mich- <br />igan transported huge volumes of water. sewage, and <br />contaminants. Each of the four reaches is discussed in more <br />detail below. <br /> <br />UPPER FLOODPLAIN REACH (POOLS 1-13) <br /> <br />RIVER ENGINEERtNG <br /> <br />Fourteen navigation dams were constructed in the <br />upper floodplain reach between Minneapolis, Minnesota, <br />and Clinton. Iowa, Pools 2-8 and 10 use midpool control <br />points or a combination of mid pool and dam point control. <br />A unique feature of the upper floodplain reach was the pur- <br />chase of approximately 50 percent of the floodplain envi- <br />ronment to create the Upper Mississippi Fish and Wildlife <br />Refuge (UMRBC. 1981), Only 8.000 acres have been <br />sequestered from the river behind levees. <br />High spots on the floodplain created many islands <br />when water levels were raised by the dams (fig, 2...{j). Their <br />number declined as they were eroded by wind- and boat- <br />generated waves rolling across the open area (impound- <br />ment) of the lower pool reach, Lower pool reaches have also <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.