My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04566
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04566
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:46:36 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:44:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Boulder
Community
Boulder
Stream Name
Gregory, Bear Can, Bluebell Can Creeks, Viele Chan
Basin
South Platte
Title
Major Drainageway Planning Volume 1, Part C
Date
9/1/1970
Prepared For
Boulder County
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br />, I <br />I <br />II <br />I <br />'I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I <br />! I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />38 <br /> <br />c, The flood plain limits must be defined <br /> <br />d. Filling of flood plain fringes should not be allowed in order <br />to maintain channel storage capability, <br /> <br />e. Hydraulic roughness should be representative of reasonably <br />maintained channel conditions, <br /> <br />f Drops or check dams should be used to control water surface <br />profile slope to control erosion after urbanization, <br /> <br />g, Perform backwater curve computations based upon existing <br />conditions with assumption that flood plain limits wi Ii be <br />revised as bridges are replaced or new roadways are constructed, <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />Riprapped or Other Lined Channels, <br />will be used with discretion, and <br />ment for minimum reaches <br /> <br />Higher Velocity artificial channels <br />only then to accommodate existing develop" <br /> <br />a. Riprap size, design velocity and "n" valves to be based upon figures <br />19, 20, and 21 of the Bureau of Public Road publication, Oesiqn of <br />Roadside Drainaqe Ditches and DRCOG criteria. <br /> <br />b. Side Slopes from 3:1 to 2:1 may be riprapped but steeper slopes must <br />be solidly lined with an anchored wall. The preferable section for <br />steeper side slopes is 0.5:1 with a retaining wall structure imbedded <br />with natural stone. Care must be taken for freeze thaw, ground water <br />and expansive soil effects. <br /> <br />c, The bottom of channels must generally be lined when either the velocity <br />exceeds 8 fps or the Froude number exceeds 0.8, <br /> <br />d. Use trickle channels for low flows with capacities of about one per <br />cent of design flow, but not to exceed 20 cfs. Riprap, concrete or <br />other protection to prevent eros,ion is needed, <br /> <br />4, <br /> <br />Bridqes. About one foot of clearance should be maintained between the <br />design water surface and the low member of a bridge. <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />Culverts, Culverts will be used in lieu of bridges where feasible. <br />water effect of culverts to be consistent with channel requirements <br />adjacent topography, Energy dissipators must be used downstream of <br />verts wherever flow is supercrltical from channel standpoint, <br /> <br />Back- <br />and <br />cul- <br /> <br />a. The use of armor plating on culvert floors must be considered when <br />the potential for wear by moving rocks and high velocities exists. <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />Conduits, Conduits are designed based upon the criteria included in the <br />storm sewers and the Major Drainage parts of the DRCOG Manual. <br /> <br />a. The maximum allowable velocity for a non-armored concrete conduit <br />shall be about 25 fps. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.