Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />f <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />j <br />I <br /> <br />IIr. le.ul <br />Septe.ber 12. 1994 <br />Page S <br /> <br />Dhadvanta.el <br /> <br />o Doel not create al .uch backwater area al Alternativel C end D. <br /> <br />o Sedillent frOll both the lIilloud liver end the alternate water lupply <br />could accllllulate behind the aill thenby 'fillina' the ezbtina bacbater <br />ana. <br /> <br />o Bigh COlt alternative. <br /> <br />o No lubltantial increase in benefit to waterfowl habitat. <br /> <br />C. Bacbeter/Vetlend COIIplex Only <br /> <br />Advanta.el <br /> <br />o Increalel the existing backwater area by approxi.ately 50 acrel. <br /> <br />o lIaintains the water levels in the exilting backwater area. <br /> <br />o Benefits fall waterfowl habitat. <br /> <br />o Low cost alternative. <br /> <br />DisadvantaR.. <br /> <br />o Sedillent fro. the lIillouri liver (during larger runoff evenu) could <br />accllllulate behind the lill thereby 'filling' the exilting end proposed <br />backwater area. <br /> <br />D. Bacbater/Vetland eo.plez with Alternate Vater Supply <br /> <br />Advant..el <br /> <br />o Increasel the exilting backwater area by approxillately 50 acrel. <br /> <br />o lIaintains the vater levell in the existing backwater area. <br /> <br />o S..1l increale of flushing of the exilting backwater area. <br /> <br />o Inte~ediate cost alternative. <br /> <br />Dhadvent..e <br /> <br />o Sedillent fro. the lIilsouri River (during larger runoff eventl) and the <br />alternate water supply could acclmUlate behind the aill thereby 'fillina' <br />the existing and proposed backwater area. <br />