Laserfiche WebLink
<br />EM 1110-2-1913 <br />31 Mar 78 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />need for shear and perhaps consolidation tests. In some cases, in the <br />design of low levees on familiar foundation deposits for example, <br />correlations between Atterberg limits values and consolidation or shear <br />strength characteristics may be all that is necessary to evaluate <br />these characteristics, Examples of correlations among Atterberg limits <br />values, natural water content, shear strength and consolidation charac- <br />teristics are shown in figures 3-2 and 3-3. Correlations based on <br />local soil types and which distinguish between normally and overcon~ <br />solidated conditions are preferable. Such correlations may also be <br />used to reduce the number of tests required for design of higher levees. <br />As optimum water content may in some cases be correlated with Atterberg <br />limi ts, comparisons of Atterberg limits and natural water contents of <br />borrow soils as shown in figure 3-4 can indicate whether the borrow <br />materials are suitable for obtaining adequate compaction. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />3-4. Shear Strength. Approximate shear strengths of fine-grained <br />cohesive soils can be rapdily determined on undisturbed foundation <br />samples, and occasionally on reasonably intact samples from disturbed <br />drive sampling, using simple devices such as the pocket penetrometer, <br />laboratory vane shear device, or the miniature vane shear device <br />(TOrvane). To establish the reliability of these tests, it is desirable <br />to correlate them with unconfined compression tests. Unconfined com- <br />pression tests are somewhat simpler to perform than Q triaxial compres- <br />sion tests, but test results exhibit more scatter. Unconfined compres- <br />sion tests are appropriate primarily for testing saturated clays which <br />are not jointed or slickensided. Of the triaxial compression tests, the <br />Q test is the one most commonly performed on foundation clays, since the <br />in situ undrained shear strength generally controls embank1nent design <br />on such soils. However, where embankments are high, stage construction <br />is being considered, or important structures are located in a levee <br />system, R triaxial compression tests and S direct shear tests should <br />also be performed. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />3-5. Consolidation. Consolidation tests are performed for those cases <br />listed in table 3-1. In some locations correlations of liquid limit <br />and natural water content with coefficient of consolidation, compression <br />index, and coefficient of secondary compression can be used satisfac- <br />torily for making estimates of consolidation of foundation clays under <br />load. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />3-6. Permeability. Generally there is no need for laboratory perme- <br />ability tests on fine-grained fill materials, nor on surface clays over- <br />lying pervious foundation deposits. In underseepage analyses, simplify- <br />ing assumptions must be made relative to thickness and soil type of <br />fine-grained surface blankets. Furthermore, animal burrows, root <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />3-6 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />~. <br />