Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />which is cleaned and maintained by the town on an as-needed basis. The flume seems to <br />have adequate stability and is in good working condition. The Town and County do not <br />seem to be particularly concerned about the stability of the wooden flume. <br /> <br />IV. ALTERNATIVE PROJECT PLANS <br /> <br />Two different methods of providing drainage improvements and flood protection for the <br />Town of Creede were investigated. They are as follows: <br /> <br />I. Provide an overflow channel (spillway) across the top of the tailings pile <br />and stabilize the pile to help prevent embankment failure during a high <br />flow event. <br /> <br />2. Remove all or a portion of the tailings pile and remove the existing steel <br />pipe to create an open channel in its place. <br /> <br />The two methods were evaluated based on the criteria of engineering constraints, <br />environmental constraints, project costs, construction methods, and operation and <br />maintenance. Overall, alternative 2 (removal of the tailings pile) would provide the most <br />reliable method of flood control for the town. However, alternative 2 would be much <br />more expensive to construct, may require extensive permitting, could adversely affect the <br />downstream water quality (temporarily), and may involve the disposal of hazardous <br />materials. A project of this scope is beyond the capacity of the Town of Creede, Mineral <br />County, and the Colorado Water Conservation Board. A future project of this scope may <br />have to be considered by the EP A or other agencies. <br /> <br />Alternative I could provide reasonable flood protection for the town without all of the <br />potential costs and other considerations associated with alternative 2. Based on the above <br />criteria, alternative I was chosen as the most feasible approach to mitigating the existing <br />flood hazard on West Willow Creek. <br /> <br />V. RECOMMENDED PROJECT PLAN <br /> <br />Hvdrologv and Hvdraulics <br />The drainage area for Willow Creek at Creede is approximately 35 square miles, and the <br />published 100-yr flow value is 1120 cfs. Based on that information, a unit discharge was <br />assumed to be 32 cfs/sq. mile for West Willow Creek at the design location. The <br />drainage area upstream of the design location was planimitered to be about 12.5 square <br />miles. Therefore, based on the assumed unit discharge, the lOO-yr flow on West Willow <br />Creek was estimated to be 400 cfs at the design location. <br /> <br />The hydraulic design of the recommended overflow channel was determined by using the <br />computer program entitled FlowMasterâ„¢ (Haestad Methods). The overflow channel was <br /> <br />3 <br />