Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />) <br /> <br />~........".>~~ -~--- . -."' <br /> <br />- .--,~,~---- ,--~ -'-~.,----.-------.._-,."'-- <br /> <br />-...-- <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />flows proceed into Buena Vista in three different locations and several <br />individual channels. Figure 2 shows the sele~ted distribution of flows <br />based on channel hydraulics and to some extent estimations. <br /> <br />HYDRAULICS <br /> <br />The ~draulic analysis consisted of computing water surface profiles' <br /> <br />, , <br />along the main and secondary channels. Soil Conservation ,Service WSP-2 <br />computer program was used to develop the profiles. Necessarydata <br />includesflood plain cross section information (di!1itized from 1'.': 200 <br />ft topographic maps)~ reach lengths. channe1 and,flood plain'hydraulic <br />roughness coeffcients. and discharge values from the hydrologic analysis. <br />~ Specific infol1Ration such as hydraulic roughness coefficients, cross <br />section data. etc. are available at the Soil Conservation Service State <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />) <br /> <br />Office in Denver. Colorado. It should be noted that through much of the <br />flood plain perched channel flow exists. This is an elevated channel <br /> <br /> <br />which receives inflow from some location upstream and maintains a flatter <br />slope than the primary channel. <br /> <br />Flood plain maps. plotted profiles. and a table of peak discharge vs <br />elevation are shown in the main report and therefore not repeated here. <br />