Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PROJECT MANAGER'S REPORT <br /> <br />The Colorado satellite-linked monitoring system, providing real-time <br />water resources data on a continuous basis from key gaging stations across the <br />state of Colorado, remains an integral tool in the hands of the State <br />Engineer, Division Engineers, and Water Commissioners in its primary utility, <br />water rights administration. The system represents an important technological <br />advance in the state's ability to monitor and evaluate current hydrologic <br />conditions in order to effectively carry out the statutory responsibilities of <br />water rights administration. <br /> <br />The goals and objectives set for FY 86-87 were achieved to a satisfactory <br />degree: <br /> <br />. Assimilate the system into a broader range of the user community. <br />. Increase valid data capture to 95%. <br />. Evaluate quality assurance criteria for real-time data collection. <br />. Increase cooperation with other operators of satellite-linked data <br />collection hardware in Colorado. <br />. Modify the Hydromet software to facilitate data editing and the <br />development of the final hydrologic record. <br />. Control operations and maintenance costs. <br /> <br />The goals and objectives for FY 87-88 are: <br /> <br />. Obtain increased General Funding. <br />. Increase valid data capture to 98%. <br />. Assimilate the monitoring system operationally within other Colorado <br />state agencies. <br />. Increase the network by 10%. <br />. Increase the system capabilities by 20%. <br /> <br />The multitude of court approved administration plans involving water <br />exchanges, augmentation, and changes in points-of-diversion, inject levels. of <br />complexity that typically cannot be effectively administered without the <br />availability of real-time data. Despite the fact that the number of adjudi- <br />cated water rights increased 19% from 1982-1987, and that the number of water <br />diversion structures requiring direct administration increased by 11%, the <br />number of water commissioners actually decreased from 94 to 93. These statis- <br />tics indicate that based strictly on an increase in structures administered, <br />the number of water commissioners should have increased by ten. If we <br />consider the increased workload due to the growing complexity being incorpo- <br />rated recently into water rights administration, it is estimated that the <br />number of water commissioners should have increased by twenty. The monitoring <br />system cannot be expected to replace the need for twenty additional water <br />commissioners but can compliment a mQderate increase in the number of water <br />commissioners. <br /> <br />-5- <br />