Laserfiche WebLink
<br />',~ <br />,~. <br />!1f <br /> <br />J: <br /> <br />,~ <br />~ <br /> <br />TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE <br /> <br />1. Report No. i:. Government Acc.sslon No. 3. Recipient', Catalog No. <br /> FHWA-RD-77-159 <br />4. Title and Subtltl. 5. Report Oat. <br /> Runoff Estimates for Small Rural Watersheds and , Octobllr 1977 <br /> Development of a Sound Design Method 6. Performing Organization Cod. <br />~e~~~~ n ii~~~~QlJIIllend~~;lgns" fo~ P~ep~r~ng D~sign <br /> ,.& <br />7. Autho.(.) 8. Performln, Organization R4I!port No. <br /> Joel E.Fletcher, A. Leon Huber, <br /> Frank W. Haws, and Calvin G. Clyde <br />9. P.rfotming Organization Name and "Address 10. Worle Unit No. <br /> Utah Water Research Laboratory FCP 3'5H'l-012 <br /> Utah State University 11. Contract or Gron' Ho. <br /> Logan, Utah 84322 DOT-FH-1l-780Q <br /> 13. Type of Repor:t and Period Coyered <br />12. Sponsoring Ageney Nome and Addre... <br /> Federal Highway Administration Final Renort <br /> U.S. Department of Transportation 14. Sponsoring Agency Cod. <br /> Washington. D.C. 20590 , <br />IS. .Supplementary Notes c- <br /> FHWA Contract Manager: Frank K. Stovicek <br />16. Abstract <br /> Frequency analyses of more than 1,000 small, watersheds in the United States <br /> and Puerto Rico were used to develop the estimation method for design of peak flow , <br /> for ungaged watersheds. This method, called the Federal Highway Administration <br /> (FHWA) method, is conceptually similar to the Bureau of PubliC' Roads (BRP) <br />method developed by W. D. Potter. The FHWA method relates the runoff peak to <br />easily determined hydrophysiographic parameters and is intended for use on <br />watersheds smaller than 50 square miles. The' concept of risk is incorporated <br /> into the design procedure. The risk is the probability that one or more events <br />will exceed a specified peak flow within the usable lifetime of the drainage <br /> structure. The return period of the design flood peak can then be modified <br /> , <br />according to the. risk the designer is willing to take. Another concept',dealing <br />with the probable maximum runoff peak derived as a function of watershed area <br />is included. The flow obtained from this relationship is considered to be the <br />upper limit of the design flow that may realistically be expected to ever occur. <br />As such it may be appropriate to use in situations where the consequences of <br />failure are extremely great. <br /> , ~ <br />The other volumes of this report are: <br />FHWARD- Subtitle <br />17-158 Vol t, Research Report <br />77-160 '1of :rn, Appendix A "Frequency Curves and Data Base" <br />17. K.v Wo,d. Hydrology, small watersheds, 18. Distribution Statement. This document is <br />hydrophysiographic zones, peak runoff, available to the public through the <br />flood frequency" regression analysis, National Technical Information Service, <br />graphical correlation, estimating Springfield, Virginia 22161. <br />discharge, design, nomographs. <br />19. Security Clonl'. (of this r.port) 20, Security Classlf. (of this pagel 21. No. of Page. 22. Price <br />I Unclassified Unclassified 368 <br /> <br />. Form DOT F 1700;7 '8.09) <br />