Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient'. Cotalog No. <br />FHWA-RD-77-l58 <br />4. Titl. and Subtitle S. Report Oat. <br />Runoff Estimates for Small Rural Watersheds and October 1977 <br />Development of a Sound Design Method 6. Performing Organlzotion Cod. <br />Volume I Research Report <br />7. Author(s) 8, Performing Organization R.port No. <br />Joel E. Fletcher,A. Leon Huber, <br />Frank.W. Haws. and Calvin G. Clvde <br />9. Performing Organization Nome ond'A<lclrlltu 10. Work Unit Ho. <br />Utah Water Research Laboratory FCP 35H3-012 <br />Utah State University 11. Contract or Gront No. <br />Logan, Utah 84322 DOT-FH-1l-7809 <br /> 13. Type of Report and,Period Covered <br />12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address . <br />Federal Highway Administration <br />U.S. Department of Transportation Final Report <br />Wa~h1ngton, D.C. 20590 14. Sponsoring Agency Cod. <br />15. SUPt:tlementory Noto. , <br />FHWA Contract Manager: Frank K. Stovicek <br />t 6. ,Abstract <br />Potter's method for runoff peak forecasting was examined on its original watersheds <br />and it was found to be soundly conceived. The method was modified to extend it to <br />other watersheds in the same States for which it was originally developed. The <br />results after modifying Potter's C parameter were found to be satisfactory. <br />The method was simplified and extended to all of the contiguous United States, <br />Alaska, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico. After beginning with a 7-parameter method, it was <br />found that 3-parameters, namely area, rainfall erosivity factor and difference in <br />elevation from top to bottom of the watershed produced peak flow estimates of vir- <br />tually equal reliability. The standard error of estimates of the ten year peak flow <br />as computed by the different equations for a random sample of 51 watersheds from <br />throughout the United States and Puerto Rico were: 39 percent for the 3-parameter <br />all zone, 62 percent for 7-parameter all zone, 50 percent for 3-parameter zone, and <br />38 percent for 7-parameter zone equations. Consequently the three parameter equa- <br />tions were selected for design purposes and nomographs for solving the equations <br />were developed for each hydrophysiographic zone 'of the United States and Puerto <br />Rico. The other volumes of this report are: <br />FHWA-RD- Subtitle <br />77-159 Vol II Recommendations for preparing design manuals and Apps B, C, <br /> D, E, F, and H <br />77-160 Vol III App A "Data and Frequency Curves" <br />17, K.. W.rds H d 1 small watersheds, 18. Distribution Statement This document is availab~ <br /> y ro ogy, <br />.hydrophysiographic zones, peak runoff, to the public through the National Techni- <br />flood frequency, regression analysis, cal Information Service, Springfield, <br />graphical correlation, estimating Virginia 22161- <br />discharge, design, nQmographs. <br />19. Security Clossil, (of this report) 20. Security Clossif. (of thi s page) 21. No. of Pagu 22. Price <br />, Unclassified 120 <br />Uncia , <br /> <br />TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE <br /> <br />Fo,m DOT F 1700.7 (....) <br /> <br />L <br />