Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />SECTIONTHREE <br /> <br />Program Plan <br /> <br />3.1.9.1 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District <br /> <br />The seven counties in the District include one county that is entirely within its jurisdiction (City <br />and County of Denver), one county that is almost entirely within its jurisdiction (City and <br />County of Broomfield) and five counties that are partially within its jurisdiction (Adams, <br />Arapahoe, Boulder, Douglas and Jefferson). CWCB staff has already proposed to UDFCD staff <br />that the District might manage the preparation of DFIRMs for the entire county of the six <br />counties not entirely within the District, not just the portions within the District. The UDFCD <br />staff expressed interest in serving that study manager function, with the exception of Boulder <br />County since the current DFIRM study is being managed by the CWCB at this time. The District <br />is an experienced CTP entity and the staff at the District already has a working relationship with <br />local floodplain managers for the six counties (in addition to Denver). Those factors place <br />Colorado into an enviable position of having a state agency that is a CTP and an internationally <br />recognized flood control district that is also a CTP. Both CTP's in Colorado are interested in <br />participating actively in the preparation of high quality floodplain mapping that serves local, <br />regional, state and federal needs. In fact, the District is already doing some of this work. <br /> <br />Approximately half of the population of Colorado lives within the District's boundaries and <br />would benefit directly from this proposed partnership. In addition, if the District is willing to <br />take on the management function for the non-District portions of the counties mentioned above, <br />a very large part of the management of Colorado Map Modernization effort could be undertaken <br />by an entity other than CWCB. That partnership would greatly enhance CWCB capabilities. <br /> <br />3.1.9.2 CWCS's Partnerships with Local Governments and the Public <br /> <br />Since the inception ofthe Map Modernization concept the CWCB has worked to establish strong <br />local partnerships as a foundation for our map modernization program. A summary of CWCB <br />efforts to date, proposed outreach efforts directly related to DFIRM projects, and additional <br />proposed outreach efforts is listed below: <br /> <br />Outreach to Date <br /> <br />. For the original outreach effort CWCB contacted all 64 counties within Colorado, as part <br />of the 2002 MMIP project, to solicit their input on the accuracy of their current flood <br />hazard maps. For this effort a survey was distributed and the results were tabulated in a <br />database that can be referenced for future scoping and restudy efforts. Topics addressed <br />included new developments or construction within the floodplain, the availability of <br />existing topographic, hydrologic, or hydraulic data, and the community's assessment of <br />the need for new topographic, hydrologic, and/or hydraulic data to be developed. <br /> <br />. The CWCB and its consulting team on the MMIP (PBS&J and Moser Associates) <br />conducted regional workshops during the summer of 2002 to provide a forum for <br />information exchange related to Map Modernization efforts. Every county and <br />community in Colorado was invited to attend a workshop, with attendance by a <br />significant number of community officials. <br /> <br />. The CWCB currently conducts "Floodplain Management 101" workshops, in cooperation <br />with the Colorado Association of Stormwater and Floodplain Managers (CASFM), to <br />assist local floodplain managers. <br /> <br />Colorado Business Case Plan - March 2004 <br /> <br />3-17 <br />