Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I- <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I, <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />SEellGNTHREE <br /> <br />Program Plan <br /> <br />Coordination Meetings, the identified needs will be incorporated into the countywide mapping <br />effort to the extent possible based upon available funding. Site-specific engineering needs that <br />are identified but which cannot be addressed due to a lack of funding will be documented <br />according to the Site Specific Needs Assessment procedures outlined in Appendix A. <br /> <br />Once the scope for a countywide mapping effort has been completed, the selected engineering <br />consultant will, in addition to the standard DFIRM tasks associated with the map update for the <br />selected county, generate planimetric information and base topography and conduct hydrologic <br />and hydraulic analysis and mapping as needed based upon the scope of the study and terms of <br />their contract. In addition, the engineering consultant will update non-revised areas, either using <br />available topography, a Limited Method analysis, or digitization of effective flood hazards based <br />upon the scope of the study and terms of their contract. The CWCB recognizes the varying level <br />of effort to update flood hazards and the varying level of accuracy of each one of them. <br /> <br />CWCB believes that the most succinct description of technical standards for accuracy and <br />quality of floodplain delineation information is contained in a formal resolution adopted by the <br />Board of Directors of the Association of State Floodplain Managers (ASFPM) at its annual <br />conference in St. Louis, Missouri on May 12,2003. The resolution in its entirety is included in <br />Appendix H of this report. The technical standards included within the resolution are listed <br />below: <br /> <br />. "The flood elevations and the floodplain delineations on the maps must correlate <br />reasonably to the best available topographic information for the stream and adjacent <br />corridor. <br /> <br />. The planimetric features on the floodplain maps (streets and highways, stream <br />centerlines, bridges and other cirtical hydraulic features, corporate limits, section lines <br />and corners, survey benchmarks, etc.) must correlate reasonably to the best available <br />aerial photos or other suitable imagery for the stream and the adjacent corridor. <br /> <br />. The flood hydrology used to develop the floodplain map must still reasonably reflect the <br />flood hazard and meet pertinent local, regional, state and federal technical standards," <br /> <br />All Map Modernization projects in Colorado will be expected to meet these technical criteria in <br />addition to technical criteria in the CWCB's Statewide Criteria Manual and FEMA's Guidelines <br />and Specifications. <br /> <br />The CWCB has identified 16 study tasks that could potentially be implemented in a countywide <br />map update. These tasks are listed in Table 3.2 below. More information on these tasks, <br />including definitions, "desired minimum standards", and cost estimating tools is included in <br />Appendix D. <br /> <br />Colorado Business Case Plan - March 2004 <br /> <br />3-7 <br />