My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04421
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04421
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2010 10:11:54 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:38:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Arapahoe
Douglas
Community
Arapahoe, Douglas
Stream Name
Piney Creek, Cottonwood Creek, Lone Tree,
Basin
South Platte
Title
Flood Hazard Area Delineation
Date
10/1/1975
Prepared For
UDFCD
Prepared By
Arapahoe, Douglas
Contract/PO #
&&
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />These floods have been generated by intense rainfall over the <br /> <br /> <br />tributary basins. Even though no recorded information is avail- <br /> <br /> <br />able for the tributary streams under study, these streams were <br /> <br /> <br />surely running out of their normal banks during the periods of <br /> <br /> <br />flooding on Cherry Creek and the South Platte River. The U.S.G.S. <br /> <br /> <br />reported the peak flow on Piney Creek in June, 1965, to be ap- <br /> <br /> <br />proximately 14,100 cfs. This is over 1.5 times the estimated <br /> <br /> <br />100-year flood magnitude for this stream. <br /> <br />to erode channel banks and carry the suspended soil material <br /> <br /> <br />as well as rocks and boulders further downstream, adding to the <br /> <br /> <br />debris and damage at the manmade obstructions. As these masses <br /> <br /> <br />of debris accumulate, the artificial barrier soon breaks loose <br /> <br /> <br />and a wall of water and debris surges further downstream to continue <br />the hazard and destruction. <br /> <br />Figures 1 and 2 show the devastation on the South Platte River in <br /> <br /> <br />1965 which resulted from unwise encroachment into the flood plain. <br /> <br /> <br />Figures 3 and 4 show flooding in Arapahoe County in 1965. As evidenced, <br /> <br /> <br />the tributary streams do flood but the high water has damaged little <br /> <br /> <br />as the flood plain has not been misused. <br /> <br />In general, both natural and manmade obstructions exist which <br /> <br /> <br />tend to restrict flood flows and cause overbank or non-channel <br /> <br /> <br />flooding. These obstructions will ofttimes result in unpredictable <br /> <br /> <br />flood flow patterns. This is particularly true of irrigation <br /> <br /> <br />canals crossing natural drainageways. The obstructions also tend <br /> <br /> <br />to become sources of debris and further obstruction when structural <br /> <br /> <br />failure results. Also, manmade flood plain obstructions tend to <br /> <br /> <br />concentrate flood flows which in turn result in increased velocities <br /> <br /> <br />and increased hazards in adjacent flooded areas. <br /> <br />- FACTORS AFFECTING FLOOD HAZARD - <br />Factors which Increase the Flood Hazard <br /> <br />Natural obstructions to flood flow include brush, trees, and other <br /> <br /> <br />lowland vegetation which naturally grow along stream banks and <br /> <br /> <br />lowlands adjoining drainageways. During periods of high flooding, <br /> <br /> <br />these obstructions tend to slow the flood velocities and as a <br /> <br /> <br />result, cause greater depths and backwater conditions that in- <br /> <br /> <br />crease flood elevations. Ofttimes the natural vegetation found <br /> <br /> <br />within the flow area becomes dislodged from its normal location <br /> <br /> <br />and accumulates as debris within the flood waters to <br /> <br /> <br />be collected at bridges and culverts and other manmade obstructions. <br /> <br /> <br />In addition to the vegetative obstructions, flood waters tend <br /> <br />It is impossible to predict the degree of accumulation of debris <br /> <br /> <br />within flood waters and the resulting effect of such accumulation. <br /> <br /> <br />This report assumed that existing structures within the flood <br /> <br /> <br />flow area would see variable clogging and reduced efficiency during <br /> <br /> <br />a major flood event. The capacity for bridge structures and box <br /> <br /> <br />culverts was reduced by 25% to account for debris accumulation at <br /> <br /> <br />the inlet. Culvert structures greater than 36 inches in diameter <br /> <br /> <br />were analyzed for blockage of 75%. Culvert structures smaller <br /> <br /> <br />than 36 inches in diameter were considered to be totally blocked <br /> <br /> <br />and ineffective. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.