My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04420
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04420
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:46:10 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:38:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
Statewide
Stream Name
All
Basin
Statewide
Title
Flood Fight Operations
Date
8/1/1996
Prepared For
FEMA
Prepared By
FEMA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Planning is only part of the flood fight process. The proper <br />response method must be selected from the options presented in <br />the plan. The selection of the correct response option involves a <br />decision-making process that is critical to the success of the <br />community response effort. <br /> <br />Notes <br /> <br />Every flood threat has different characteristics. Each element <br />of that threat must be compared and weighed against the available <br />response options. This may not be a one-time process. As <br />variables change in the threat equation, different options may <br />emerge or be discarded. The decision-making process must be <br />adaptable and flexible enough to continually evaluate the threat <br />and available options. This is to be sure that the current course of <br />action remains the most desirable. <br /> <br />The decision-making process must evaluate many factors and <br />provide the best possible counters to the flood threat. Each factor <br />is important and it is difficult to give one element more credence <br />than another. The match of elements must be considered when <br />choosing a final response option. <br /> <br />The first step in the decision-making process is to realistically <br />evaluate the forecast flood threat. But hard and clear answers may <br />be rare in this step of the process. For example, a stalled weather <br />system can make weather forecasting extremely difficult. Under <br />such conditions, flood forecasts may frequently change. Obvious- <br />ly, changes in the expected flood crest can have dramatic implica- <br />tions on the flood fight. <br /> <br />Key questions to ask when evaluating the flood threat include: <br /> <br />--.--------'1----wnen IS the fiver expected to crest and at what elg t. <br /> <br />-.j What will be the duration of high water levels? <br /> <br />-.j Will there be one or multiple flood crests? <br /> <br />-.j Are other factors present that could change the forecast, Le. <br />weakened dams upstream or threat of upstream levee <br />failures? <br /> <br />-.j Are other threats present that could complicate the flood <br />fight Le., high winds, ice flows, snow or rain, high or low <br />temper.atures? <br /> <br />Page5-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.