Laserfiche WebLink
<br />A more detailed analysis of flood record homogeneity was conducted with <br />detailed precipitation and temperature records of duration comparable to the <br />American River flood discharge series. The American River basin and surrounding <br />areas contain a number of National Weather Service and cooperative meteorological <br />stations active since the late 19th century or early 20th century. To construct a series <br />of estimated basin average precipitations suitable for evaluating the homogeneity of <br />American River flood records, daily data were assembled for the stations, shown in <br />Table 2.1. <br />Daily precipitation and temperature data in electronic format were obtained <br />from the Western Regional Climate Center (WRCC) for the period 1949-1997 for <br />Represa, Auburn, Placerville, and Lake Spaulding; and for the period 1931-1997 for <br />Nevada City and Lake Talhoe. Original data for the period 1900 (or earliest available <br />year) to 1930 were obtained on microfiche from the National Climatic Data Center <br />(NCDC) and digitized by Charles Rodgers (consultant to the committee). A system <br />of cross checks allowed reasonable quality control, and the digitized daily <br />precipitation data are judged to be as accurate as the printed sources from which they <br />were taken. Since coverage for some early years was absent at key stations (e.g., <br />Lake Spaulding) and many early records were of poor quality, a continuous set of <br />daily precipitation records judged to be of acceptable quality could be assembled <br />only for the water year 1915 through water year 1997. This is sufficient, however, to <br />support an analysis based on 41 years of pre-regulation (1915-1955) and 42 years of <br />post-regulation (1956-1997) precipitation and flood discharge data. <br />The bivariate test and several regression models were used to determine the <br />homogeneity of the American River three-day discharge series relative to a series of <br />estimated concurrent maximum three-day basin average precipitation. The latter <br />series was constructed in two steps. First, we computed the weighted average of the <br />daily precipitation amounts from the gages for each day of the seven-day period <br />ending with the end of the discharge event. We then selected the maximum three- <br />day precipitation total for each discharge event. The weights used to construct the <br />basin average (Table 2.1) were derived from elevation-area data from the American <br />River supplied by Robert Collins of the USACE Sacramento District. Figure 2.6 <br />shows the time series of basin average precipitation. Note the apparent increase in <br />large events since 1950, consistent with the observed increase in three-day maximum <br />discharges. <br />In applying the bivariate test, the test series was the American River three- <br />day flood volume and the regional series was the three-day basin average <br />precipitation. The test was applied to the logarithms of the respective series, since <br />both series are positively skewed in real space but approximately normal in log <br />space. The test detected no significant shifts in mean, which can be interpreted as <br />evidence that the behavior of American River floods, during the period 1956-1997 in <br />particular, did not depart systematically from the pattem of precipitation in the <br />catchment. <br />As an additional test of record homogeneity, a family of regression models <br />was estimated to predict three-day American River flood volumes using basin- <br />weighted mean precipitation, temperature, and a variety of additional variables as <br />potential predictors. The procedure used was to specifY the best model, defined as <br />the rnodel that explained the greatest percentage of interannual variation in American <br /> <br />28 <br /> <br />Improving American River Flood Frequency Analyses <br /> <br /> <br />- <br />