Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br /> <br />Section 3 of the River and Harbor Act approved <br />June 13, 1902, be, and is hereby requested to <br />review the reports on the Arkansas River and <br />tributaries contained in House Document 308, <br />Seventy-fourth Congress, First Session, with a <br />view to determining whether any modification <br />should be made therein at this time with respect <br />to local flood protection along the main stem of <br />the Arkansas River. <br /> <br />2. In view of the urgent requests of local interests for immedi- <br />ate consideration of the serious flood problem at and in the vicinity <br />of Las Animas, Colo., the Chief of Engineers directed this interim <br />report to be submitted prior to completion of the comprehensive report <br />which wi I I be submitted in response to the above-cited resolutions. <br /> <br />3. PRIOR REPORTS.- The survey reports referenced in the resolu- <br />tions quoted above were submitTed in partial compl iance to Congressional <br />requests enacted in 1924, 1927, and 1928, which tal led for flood control <br />surveys on al I tributary streams of the Mississippi River System subject <br />to destructive floods. The report reviewed herein, Part I - Arkansas <br />River and Minor Tributaries, dated June 10, 1932, was publ ished as <br />Volume I of House Document No. 308, 74th Congress. Surveys made at <br />that time found no justification for local flood protection improve- <br />ments along the Arkansas River in Colorado. However, on the basis of <br />findings contained in the report, the Congress authorized construction <br />of the John Martin Dam by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on the <br />Arkansas River about 18 mi les be low Las Animas. The project was com- <br />pleted in October 1948 for flood control and conservation of irrigation <br />water. <br /> <br />4. Several other reports have been submitted by the Corps of Engi- <br />neers regarding the flood and related problems in the Arkansas River <br />Basin in Colorado; however, they are not pertinent to the flood problem <br />at Las Animas. These reports have been publ ished as fol lows: <br /> <br />a. House Document No. 186, 78th Congress, Fountaine Que <br />Soui I Ie (Fountain) River and its Tributaries, Colorado. In accordance <br />with the recommendations of this report, Congress authorized con- <br />struction of the Templeton Gap Floodway for the protection of the <br />eastern portion of the city of Colorado Springs. The project was com- <br />pleted in 1949. <br /> <br />b. House Document No. 327, 81st Congress, Arkansas River, <br />LOcal Flood Protection at Pueblo, Colorado. As recommended in this <br />report, Congress authorized the construction of a levee extension to <br />the Arkansas River Floodway at Pueblo. The project was completed in <br />1952. <br /> <br />c. House Document No. 387, 78th Congress, Purqatoire (Picket <br />Wire) River, Colorado. Although a channel improvement project on the <br /> <br />2 <br />