Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~~ <br /> <br />'d_ -. <br />'" <br /> <br />;.""-:.,;~ <br /> <br />SYLLABUS <br /> <br /> <br />This report comprises the results of an investigation of the <br />flood and al I led problems along the Arkansas River and its tributaries <br />at and in the vicinity of Las Animas, Colorado. Las Animas is located <br />on the south bank of the Arkansas River just above its confluence with <br />the Purgatoire River, a major tributary which enters from the south. <br />The flood plain in this area includes urban and suburban lands and <br />improvements; irrigated and grazing lands and improvements, highways, <br />and rai Iroads. A sma I I area of the flood plain also is subject to <br />inundation from very rare floods on the Purgatoire River. Under <br />special authorizations during the period from 1950 to 1956, the Corps <br />of Engineers constructed a pi lot channel and installed bank stabi I iza- <br />tion works along the Arkansas River at Las Animas. Several years later, <br />local interests extended the pi lot channel downstream. These works <br />provide protection against frequent sma I I floods. Flooding of rural <br />I ands beg i ns with a f low of 6,500 c. f. s. and urban areas with flows <br />of 10,000 c.f.s. <br /> <br />The largest recorded floods on the Arkansas River at Las Animas <br />occurred in 1921 and 1955 when estimated peak discharges of 187,000 <br />c.f.s. and 44,000 c.f.s., respectiveiy, were reached. Barrier Dam, <br />constructed in 1924-25 on the Arkansas River about 6 mi les above <br />Pueblo by the Pueblo Conservancy District, would have reduced the <br />1921 flood to 140,000 c.f.s. Recurrence of the 1921 and 1955 floods <br />under the existing state of development would cause damages of <br />$3,135,000 and $275,000, respectively. A multiple-purpose reservoir <br />project has been authorized for construction by the U.S. Bureau of <br />Reclamation at the Pueblo dam site on the Arkansas'River at approxi- <br />mately the same site as the Barrier Dam. This project is an element <br />of the authorized Fryingpan-Arkansas Project. If the Pueblo Dam had <br />been in operation, the peak discharge of the 1921 flood would have <br />been reduced to 108,000 c.f.s. at Las Animas and the 1955 flood would <br />have been reduced to 38,000 c.f.s. The damages from floods of these <br />magnitudes under the existing state of development would be $2,490,000 <br />and $152,000, respectively. <br /> <br />During the publ ic hearings, channel straightening and installation <br />of steel jetties were suggested as a solution to the flood problem. <br />However, during subsequent meetings and conferences with local interests, <br />they expressed the opinion that channel ization alone would not solve <br />the problem and that levees also would be required to provide adequate <br />flood contro I. <br /> <br />The water resources problems in the Arkansas River Basin in <br />Colorado and possible solutions were investigated in a comprehensive <br />basin study conducted during the period 1950 to 1955 by interested <br />Federal and State agencies. The report thereon presented a long-range <br />plan for the development and uti lization of the water and land re- <br />sources of the Arkansas, White, and Red River Basins. The plan <br />