My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04360
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04360
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:46:01 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:34:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Bent
Community
Las Animas
Stream Name
Arkansas River
Basin
Arkansas
Title
Interim Report on Review Survey for Flood Control
Date
8/1/1963
Prepared For
Las Animas
Prepared By
US Army Corps of Engineers
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />the existing Barrier Dam. Municipal ities to be provided with supple- <br />mental water include Pueblo, Colorado Springs, and val ley towns aiong <br />the Arkansas River. The val ley towns, including Las Animas, wi I I be <br />served by a trunk pipel ine about 130 mi les in length extending down- <br />stream from Pueblo Reservoir. In addition, the towns of Crowley, Eads, <br />and Wi ley wi II be served by branch pipel ines total ing about 36 mi les <br />in length. Hydroelectric power wi I I be generated at seven power plants <br />located on the eastern slope. <br /> <br />36. The Pueblo Reservoir wi I I have a capacity of about 400,000 <br />acre-feet of wh ich 93,000 acre-feei is allocated to flood control. The <br />Corps of Engineers wi I I have the responsibi I ity of prescribing regula- <br />tions for the use of the flood control storage, as specified under <br />Section 7 of the 1944 Flood Control Act. About one-third of the <br />Arkansas River Bas i n above Las An i mas will be contro I I ed by the Pueb 10 <br />Dam; however, storms occurring over the large uncontrol led drainage <br />area below the dam could produce major floods at Las Animas. An impor- <br />tant effect of the project with respect to the flood problem at Las <br />Animas wi II be the reduction of flood peaks and frequency of overf low <br />from floods originating above Pueblo. It is estimated that if this <br />project had been in operation prior to the 1921 flood, the flood peak <br />of 187,000 c.f.s. at Las Animas would have been reduced to 108,000 <br />c. t.s. <br /> <br />37. REMAINING WATER RESOURCES PROBLEMS AND NEEDS.- The existing <br />projects and the authorized projects wi I I make a significant contribu- <br />tion toward meeting the major water resources needs in the Arkansas <br />River Basin. The Trinidad Dam and Reservoir Project wi I I afford a <br />high degree of protection to Trinidad and vicini*y from floods on the <br />Purgatoire River, and optimum regulation of river flows for irrigation. <br />In addition, it wi II provide a much-needed recreational faci I ity. The <br />Fryingpan-Arkansas Project wi I I bring additional water into the basin <br />to alleviate irrigation shortages; make more water avai lable for mu- <br />nicipal and industrial purposes at Pueblo, Colorado Springs, Las Animas, <br />and other towns; provide hydroelectric power and recreational oppor- <br />tunities; and reduce flooding on the main stem of the Arkansas River <br />between Pueblo and John Martin Dam. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />38. Nevertheless, there wi I I be many unsolved problems, even after <br />completion of the authorized projects. Although Pueblo Dam wi I I reduce <br />flooding on the main stem from Pueblo to John Martin Dam, the uncon- <br />trolled triblltary inflow below the dam wi II cause flood problems at <br />La Junta and Las Animas, and throughout much of the agricultural area. <br />There wi I I be main stem flood problems also at Florence, Portland, and <br />other local ities above the Pueblo dam site. Flood prOblems known to <br />exist from tributary streams that would not be affected by the authorized <br />projects include Coal Creek at Florence, Dry Creek and Fountain Creek at <br />Pueblo, Fountain Creek at Colorado Springs, King and Anderson Arroyos <br />at La Junta, Huerfano River at Walsenburg, and Wolf Creek at Granada. <br /> <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.