Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,/ ./ <br />/ ,/ <br />//"" ~ <br />,/ /' -'- ", <br />" /./;,>// \'-~',"\ ./ / // <br />'- " ' , ' /,/ / <br />'-" '- ,///' ". \,\ .. / <br />'\ '" ,/ /' . ", //',// <br />,-.--..,, //// .\\\... // /~ <br />, ,"'/ // '-. '\,\ ,/ // ,/ <br />., ,/ -\ / <br />will create a fiscal challenge for FEM~5i.(the years ahead that,>>,~tJ.15e intensified by the <br />fac1 that approximately half of the 7fj'ettive NFIP maps are )fr,years old or older and , <br />obviously in need of updating. // /</ .< " <br />/ ~:// ////'/ ,///// <br />-' -' / / / ,/ <br />Reduction in Time to CO!'J'iie//;,Studies, FEMA r~Og;;izes that the time to comylt;1e' <br />stud}rs is too long in lil}'h(ofihe:r~al-time ef~9S"that NFIP mapping has on;he~rtgage <br />and~~uilding indu~t~~s, The need'tQ'reA~e)his time period is a top pri~J"-itY/./Sevehl!, <br />initIatives ar~<be'jRg pursued to re-englneer the study process.,/>/'<', / ;:" <br />/-' ,);':// /,-:',// "<''-\-, ,/ // <br />ftlod1j(:.in'Jifl,faps for Flood-prone but Unmapped Communitie~/)v1~re than 18,000 \',// <br />~~~iUriities participate in the NFIP, Another 4,000 to, 5;~G9.6ommunities (I) participa;e/>/ <br />DETk:,"'i,'~ ~~UDy--'njne NFIP but have never had maps produced, or (2) 9o:,rrot participate in the NFIP /~/ <br />\~\ g6 not have NFIP maps. Of the communities in the~,:iroups, many have no or nJiljirfial <br />4>' 9flood hazards. A percentage of these communiti~(however, are indeed floop..prone and <br />, need maps to identifY flood-hazard for two r~aftons. First, some lenders w\H/rlot make <br />/+~;W unmapped, non-participating cOfJlrllunities because of the uncer:tajrlty of risk and <br />:~Zthbl fulftvailability of flood insurance. ,.s:~6nd, the availability of flo9<fJrazard data in the / < <br />, wak~ of floodiilg <Hsast.ers is vilal t9'recovery and rebuilding effor(s:"FEMA is / / <br />identifYing unmapped ti(jodcpromi\iommunities and will proftt1C{(NFIP maps quantifYing //:. <br />=~ONE A\!ood hazards in th~se communiYtts, In addition to. reso~yj~the problems discussed /\\ <br />above, the productIOn of maps fPttheli.e. commumlIes/sljOlild also encourage many of />/ , , <br />them to join the program. /' -..'-, ". // ,// '.<>. <br />/ // -, "'~-:::--"'j'>"- ./ </ "' '- '\ <br />Delegation of LOMA/LOMR/f Issuing AuthoritY:<F~MA expects to receive/anJ!ip;ocess ' ' <br />more than 10,000 requests ,for LOMAs and LOMR-R~in FY 97. Proces~~inj-\VilI cost <br />approximately $4 million 6r', roughly, ten percent oftITe:~FIP mapping'J>Udget. FEMA <br />p,lans to actively pursue d~l~gation of the authority to issu,'e.LOM~s;ana LOMR-Fs in <br />! certain tightly controlled ah~defined situations to licensed\~l\of~i>s{onal engineers and <br />/ /Iand surveyors or individual'~rn!llunities. It is estimated thll,t-granting this authority to <br />',- '-- ./ / <br />the 10cal;t(M\1EU<i1l reduce FEMN~I"OMA and LOMR,P;mse docket by approximately <br />50 percent. In turn, this should maRe,'!\fl additional,$r:to $2 million available for updating <br />, --' ,--' <br />the maps tht~hthe FEMA-funded s~Ciy/restuMp'rogram. <br />l/"/ -~-"'<:'''--'''-- '-'\"'\ ,/-';./--' <br />Establi#ent of Pujili~J.?o,main Base M,;P;Standard. Whenever possible, FEMA uses <br />the 10l~ county's or comnitlJiity~s di~'base map in the creation ofDFIRMs. This has <br />num~l{bus advantages, including~ru;:J'act that the locally produced base map is normally <br />monl'd';~iled than that avai1aJ>l~from the USGS digital line graph. Second, by usil}gthe~ <br />community'Sbase map to co;npile and register the flood theme overla)',tHerg:WIf1,lle';'::~:::=: <br />agreement bctwbt;~th~~6d-hazard data, which should f~cilitllt~"~lf.s~"6{iheQigital <br />data by the commy)ltfy/for various GIS application~./L"9.91lfi5Wdl1ced digital base maps, <br />however, are cOnlpiled and produced to vari911S,JforiSsllllrdiird specifications that <br />frequently diffir/from those needed fOf,NflP:rr(ajJproduction. As a result, FEMA spends <br />a substantial iqigllUtdlill1e modifyijligjllireimancing communities' base maps for NFIP <br />use. ~o rem~;tliis-s(t;~:ll.-~>:~ls pre.se~tly pursuing the devel?pm~nt of a public <br />domam base,map. Th\ssh61:l1dreduce or ehmmate the need for modificatIOn of base <br />.".._"--:=maps~Ey:.ER.~-b'efo~:NI,jP..1l1ajLQroduction can begin. <br />//' .. -,,/:>-' .-,--' --- -- 7 /' - -----.,----- <br />, ///./'/ ,/ / / <br />..--,_/~_./: ./' --' -' <br />--' ..~;;::;:::~.._-~~.~~,_=I:~, \,,__//;>-' / <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />"'d' <br /> <br />/ <br /> <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />, ' <br />, <br /> <br />22 <br /> <br />-7,r- <br />, , <br />/ i <br />Ii <br /> <br />./ <br />--',/" <br /> <br />/' /' <br />/ // <br />/ / <br />// <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />/~ <br />/ <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />"."'f' ',"'" <br />_.-- <br />J <br /> <br />r;;'-.. <br /> <br />'."--' <br /> <br />',..::.:=':::,-=1 <br />