Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3.1 Hydrologic Analyses <br /> <br />Hydrologic analyses were carried out to establish peak discharge- <br />frequency relationships for each flooding source studied by <br />detailed methods affecting the cOllllllUnity. <br /> <br />Cornet Creek is ungaged and the gaging station on the San Miguel <br />River near Telluride has only a five-year record (1961 to 1965). <br />The gaging station on the San Miguel River near P1acervil1e has a <br />40-year record. In order to have a consistent hydrologic analysis <br />within San Miguel County, a regional relationship developed by the <br />study contractor relating basin area to peak discharge was the <br />method used for the San Miguel River. Gaging stations within <br />hydrologic area No. 10 of flood frequency Region B (listed below) <br />were used to establish the regional relationship. <br /> <br />USGS Drainage Length <br />Station Area of Record Period of <br />No. Station Location (sa. mi.) (vears) Record <br />091450 Uncompahgre River at Ouray 44.0 14 1911-1924 <br />091460 Uncompahgre River below Ouray 76.0 16 1914-1929 <br />091464 West Fork Dallas Creek near <br /> Ridgeway 13.2 15 1956-1970 <br />091465 East Fork Dallas Creek near <br /> Ridgeway 16.8 16 1948-1970 <br />091650 Dolores River below Rico 105.0 25 1952-1976 <br />091681 Disappointment Creek near <br /> Dover Creek 145.0 19 1958-1976 <br />091720 Fall Creek 2.7 miles upstream <br /> from the mouth 33.5 18 1942-1959 <br />091725 San Miguel River near P1acervi11e 308.0 40 1930-1976 <br />091745 Cottonwood Creek near Nuc1a 43.0 10 1942-1951 <br />091750 Naturita Creek near Norwood 27. 7 12 1942-1952 <br />091755 San Miguel River at Naturita 1,080.0 48 1918-1976 <br />091775 Taylor Creek near Gateway 12.0 26 1945-1967 <br /> <br />The method developed by the U.S. Water Resources Council (Reference <br />6) was used to determine the floodflow frequency relationship based <br />on log-Pearson Type III distribution for each selected gaging <br />station. Gaging stations which have 10 or more years of record, <br />and stations where peak flows are not affected by regulation and <br />diversion were used for developing the regional relationship. <br /> <br />Because the annual peak discharge published in the USGS Water <br />Supply Papers (References 7, 8, and 9) and the USGS Surface Water <br />Records (Reference 10) were a mixture of floodflows caused by <br />snowmelt and rainfall events, the regional relationship established <br />by using these annual peak discharges does not reflect intense <br />rainfall-produced floods. A more detailed method was used for each <br />gaging station to develop regional relationships for this area. <br />The procedures were as follows: (1) the rain and snowmelt data <br /> <br />8 <br />