Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />t <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS <br /> <br />Introduction <br /> <br />The primary objective of any urban drainage project is <br /> <br />to protect flood-prone areas in urban centers. In broad <br /> <br />terms, two alternatives are available: leave the flood-hazard <br /> <br />areas relatively vacant and undeveloped, or to use hard-lined <br /> <br />channels and underground conduits to carry off flood waters <br /> <br />safely. In many cases, property values in urbanized areas <br /> <br />are high, creating strong pressures for the channel-conduit <br /> <br />solution. At the same time, there is a growing appreciation <br /> <br />of the esthetic values of open space for its own sake and of <br /> <br />multiple uses of such space for recreation purposes. <br /> <br />Thus, those who must make the decisions between alterna- <br /> <br />tives face conflicting factors, economic and social, and <br /> <br />decisions often are based on largely emotional and intuitive <br /> <br />arguments, or on immediate economic pressures. Since the <br /> <br />choice may profoundly affect -- indeed may determine -- not <br /> <br />only the life styles but the economic status, in terms of prop- <br /> <br />erty values, of the present generation but of future genera- <br /> <br />tions as well, the decision-makers should have available facts <br /> <br />and reasonable assumptions to assist them. The benefit-cost <br /> <br />analysis is a tool providing such information. <br /> <br />~ Leonard Rice Consulting Water Engineers. Inc. <br />