Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />I <br />I' <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />'. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />TABLE OF CONTENTS <br /> <br />Headinq <br /> <br />Introduction <br /> <br />Benefit-Cost Objective: <br /> <br />Formulation of Flood Control Study Criteria <br /> <br />Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analyses <br /> <br />Formulation of Alternatives <br /> <br />Benefit-Cost Methodology <br /> <br />Example of Benefit-Cost Analysis <br /> <br />Summa ry <br /> <br />Appendix I <br /> <br />LIST OF TABLES <br /> <br />Table <br /> <br />1. Depth Damage Curves, Structures-Residential and <br />Small Business <br /> <br />2. Depth Damage Curves, Contents-Residential <br /> <br />3. Per Acre Factors for Estimating Flood Damages in <br />Homogeneous Areas <br /> <br />4. Damage Tabulation Sheet for Non-Homogeneous Areas <br /> <br />5. Weighted Factors for Estimating Future Flood <br />Damages for Undeveloped Areas <br /> <br />6. Summary of Flood Damages for Reach <br /> <br />7. Benefits for Alternatives <br /> <br />8. Summary of End of Year Costs over Project Life <br /> <br />9. Selection of Most Economic Alternative by Net <br />Benefit Method <br /> <br />~ Leonard Rice Consulting Water Engi,eers, Inc, <br /> <br />Paqe <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />45 <br /> <br />46 <br /> <br />24 <br /> <br />25 <br /> <br />29 <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />31 <br /> <br />33 <br /> <br />39 <br /> <br />41 <br /> <br />44 <br />