My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04286
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04286
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:45:49 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:31:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
23
County
Adams
Community
Westminster
Stream Name
Big Dry Creek
Basin
South Platte
Title
Major Drainageway Planning - Master Plan - Big Dry Creek - Westminster - Volume I
Date
3/1/1973
Designation Date
7/1/1973
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />SECT! ON V I <br /> <br />DESIGN CRITEFiIA <br /> <br />The magn Itude of the size of the Big Dry Cre",k drainage bas In, the <br />relatively undeveloped nature of the basin, the e>:lstence of continued low <br />flows from Irrigation releases throughout '" subst",ntlal portion of the year, <br />and the relative Infrequency of large magnitude storm discharges typical <br />of many streams, combine to make the design crltHla for Big Dry Creek some- <br />what different than for basins that produce smaller runoff quantities In <br />areas already substantially urbanized. While basic hydrologic, hydraulic, <br />sociologic, economic, and other related principles are stili vIable, certain <br />subtle differences exist concerning constraints, as well as opportunitIes <br />that must be consIdered to achieve an effective preliminary design. With <br />the expanse of the Big Dry Creek flood plaIn, the approach to desIgn must <br />consider multiple use, Including large scale use by people for recreation <br />and for pedestrian - bike travel, and must consld.er preservation of the <br />natural flora and fauna In certain areas. This section lists and describes <br />the crIteria used in the preparation of this prelImInary design, Including <br />those plans which were considered and dIscarded. <br /> <br />During Phase A of this study, It was determined that a "non-structural" <br />approach was the most desIrable manner by which t,o approach the PrelimInary <br />Design. The partIcular alternate that was chosen Is a flood plain approach <br />with structural Improvements (channels, blrdges etc.) limited to those <br />areas where for fInancial and for other criteria it Is desirable to protect <br />appurtenant features and/or channelize the flood waters. It Is Important <br />that the desIgn criterIa be well conceived so as to maximize the benefits <br />to be obtained and to Insure that the major draln-age system will operate <br />as I n tended. <br /> <br />As Iterated In previous reports, the major drainage sy,;tem will operate <br />whether or not It Is planned or designed, and whether or not urban development <br />Is wisely located In respect to It. In the first phase of this study, <br />much of the criteria for this report was established In that a concept was <br />determined and a design return frequency (100 year's) was chosen. <br /> <br />The criteria presented following constItute ," refinement In the crIteria <br />used to determine the concept and return frequency. The design criterIa <br />utIlIzed for thIs prelIminary design are the)se contained In the Denver Re- <br />gional Council of Governments Urban Storm Oralnag'" Criteria Manual, Volumnes <br />One and Two. Specific planning and design criteria applicable to the Big <br />Dry Creek study are: <br /> <br />I. Natural Channels, Natural waterways will be used wherever feasible. <br /> <br />a. Channel and overbank capacity must b,,, adequate for design <br />runoff . <br /> <br />V I-I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.