My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04286
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04286
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:45:49 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:31:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
23
County
Adams
Community
Westminster
Stream Name
Big Dry Creek
Basin
South Platte
Title
Major Drainageway Planning - Master Plan - Big Dry Creek - Westminster - Volume I
Date
3/1/1973
Designation Date
7/1/1973
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />111-2 <br /> <br />Section. No attempt would be made under thi's alternate to structurally <br />reduce flooding to existing structures, roads, bridges, sewer plants, <br />or IrrIgation ditches, The resulting damages are in an annual cost <br />form by studyIng the resulting flood plain of three or four different <br />flood frequences, With this altemate, the effort is primarily aimed <br />at adoptIng appropriate regulations. In addi tlon to flood damages, <br />there are certain maintenance requirements associated with erosion <br />and channel cleaning for IrrigatIon flows. <br /> <br />2. Flood Plain Zonln with Minimal Struqural I.!nprovements - (Seml-Non- <br />Structural Alternative This altern,ste Is based on the IOO-year <br />flood plain under projected future developmE,nt as It would be 'lIhen <br />culvert, brIdge and related Improvements are made: <br /> <br />a, Where for economic and/or sociologic re"SOns it is prudent to <br />reduce the flood plaIn width. <br /> <br />b. Where for reasons of economics and of meeting street overtopping <br />requl rements, it Is necessary to raise E,mbankments and to COn- <br />struct bridges or culverts, even though the flood plain width <br />I s no t reduced. <br /> <br />The economI c criterion for the above (and for subsequent a I ter- <br />nates) Is that the resulting annu;;lI cost of construction and reduced <br />level of maintenance Is less than the annual darn<.ges and maintenance <br />If the Improvements were not made. H"retofore, few reliable attempts <br />have been made at estimating benefits for the sociological, recrea- <br />tional, and road criteria, Selectlve.ly, rOeld, sociological and <br />recreational criteria may prevail in some areas even though economic <br />criteria may show an alternate to be economically less desirable. <br /> <br />Because of the traffic and other urban requi rements related to <br />the criteria of the Drainage CrIteria Manual" the bridges and street <br />crossings On Big Dry Creek wi I I bE' replaced, or expanded, and most of <br />the flooding adjacent to roads wi I I be reduced in the normai course <br />of urban development. What remains, then, Is the damage to specifIc <br />existing structures, bridges, embankml".,ts, end other flood-susceptible <br />appurtenances and property. <br /> <br />For this al ternate, the design approach Is essentially non- <br />structural. Channel work is primarily that "ssociated with bridge <br />and hIghway work, which would be done '1Ilth Or without a flood hazard <br />problem to solve. <br /> <br />3. Lined Open Channel. In many already urbanized ar'eas, lined op."., <br />channels, especially grass-lIned and European-type, have become a <br />desIrable means of achieving multi-USE' greenbelts. However, arti- <br />ficial open channels are usually justl fled only when the natural <br />channel no longer exists. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.