My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04285
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04285
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:45:49 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:31:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
270
County
Adams
Community
Westminster
Stream Name
Big Dry Creek & Tributaries
Basin
South Platte
Title
Flood Hazard Area Delineation - Big Dry Creek & Tributaries
Date
11/1/1986
Designation Date
12/1/1987
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Percent Impervious Values <br /> <br />the laO-year flows. Both reservoirs release a lOa-year outflow equal to <br />25-50% of the peak 100-year inflow. Refer to page 2 of this report for <br />further discussion concerning Standley Lake and Great Western Reservoir. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The percentage of impervious area for each sub-basin was determined from <br />recent aerial photographs (Reference 12) for the existing conditions and <br />from the City of Westminster Comprehensive Plan (Reference 1) for ultimate <br />conditions. The typical percentage of impervious area for general land <br />use categories used in the study are shown in the following table. <br /> <br />Compu ted Resu 1 ts <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Single-Family Residential <br />Medium Density (4.4 du/acre) <br />Low Density (1.6 du/acre) <br />Multi-Family Residential <br />Commercial and Industrial <br />Open Space <br /> <br />40% <br />30% <br />60% <br />80% <br />5% <br /> <br />Based on the CUHP-D/HEC-l flood routing analyses, peak discharges for the <br />2-, 5-, 10- and laO-year floods assuming ul tima te deve loped condi tions <br />were computed for various design points within the basin. The locations <br />of the sub-basins are shown on the Drainage Basin Boundary Map (Sheets 3 <br />and 4 of 83) located in the report Appendix. Flood Discharge/Probability <br />Profiles for each stream studied in this report are shown on Figures 1 to <br />19. It should be noted that hydrographs for the Nissen Reservoir and West <br />Lake Basins draining from the City of Broomfield were obtained directly <br />from Reference 13. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />TABLE 5 <br />PERCENT IMPERVIOUS VALUES <br /> <br />Land Use <br /> <br />Percent Impervious <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />All technica 1 documenta tion for this hydrologic study' is provided in a <br />separately published technical addendum (Reference 14) and is available at <br />the offices of the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />For a sub-basin consisting of more than one land use designation, a compo- <br />site value was determined. Table 6 lists data developed for all sub- <br />basins in the hydrologic analyses. <br /> <br />Unit Hydrograph Coefficients <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Snyder Unit Hydrograph coefficients'were developed using the UD&FCD Cri- <br />teria (Reference 10). The' unit hydrograph coefficients are based on basin <br />slope, basin area, basin length, centroidal length and percent of impervi- <br />ous area. Table 6 lists data developed for all sub-basins in the hydro- <br />logic analyses. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Rou tings <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />For the stream routing anlayses, a typical cross-section for' each sub- <br />basin was determined for use in the HEC-l Modified PuIs, normal depth, <br />Storage-Outflow channel routing method. Mannings roughness values of <br />0.035 to 0.055 for channel areas and 0.05 to 0.075 were used for overbank <br />areas to produce stable channel routings and Froude Numbers less than 0.9. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />For Standley Lake and Great Western Reservoirs, reservoir routings were <br />performed using a Modified PuIs routing based on elevation/storage/dis- <br />charge relationships developed for proposed reservoir conditions (Refer- <br />ences 6 and 7). Both reservoirs were assumed to be full to the spillway <br />crest as the initial condition. All other reservoirs were assumed inef- <br />fective for flood control purposes. The same assumption was applied to <br />undersized road crossings considering the uncertainty of future develop- <br />ment and crossing improvements. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The effects of the channel routings on peak flows (channel and overbank <br />storage) resul ted in reduc tions of 0 to 30 percent. Both Standley Lake <br />and Great Western Reservoirs have a significant impact on the reduction of <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.