Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-If <br /> <br />RECEIVED <br />DEe 0 8 1995 <br /> <br />GfIIMIPHIDGY <br /> <br />ELSEVIER <br /> <br />Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board <br />Geomorphology 00 ( (995) 000-00o <br /> <br />Coarse-sediment distribution as evidence of an elevation limit for <br />flash flooding, Bear Creek, Colorado <br /> <br />Michael M. Grimm I, Ellen E, W ohl, Robert D. Jarrett <br />Department of Earth Resources. Colorado State Universiry, Ft. Collins. CO 80523. USA <br />U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division. Box 25046, MS 418, Denver Federal Center, Denver. CO 80225. USA <br /> <br />Received to October 1994; revised 18 Febru::rry 1995; accepted 3 March 1995 <br /> <br />Abstract <br /> <br />Bear Creek is a tributary of the South Platte River in central Colorado. The stream flows east from an elevation of 4348 m at <br />the Continental Divide to the mounlain front at 1670 m. It thus encompasses the 2300 m elevation limit for substantial rainfall <br />flooding io tbe Colorado Front Range proposed by Jarrett. Maximum paleoflood discharges estimated from flood deposils al <br />four sites along Bear Creek demonstrate a consistent decrease in unit discharge with increasing elevation and support the <br />hypothesis of an upper elevation limit for rainfall floods. The unit discharge values were used to explain coarse-sediment <br />distribution along Bear Creek. Measurements of coarse. grained channel sediment at 19 sites along the creek indicate a decrease <br />in particle size in flood deposits with increasing elevation. as well as a decrease in the size of clasts introduced to the main <br />channel along tributaries. These changes in grain size are hypothesized [0 reflect changes in the competence of Channel transport <br />as a result of snowmelt-dominated versus rainfall.dominated discharge regimes above and below 2100 m elevation. Calculations <br />of flow competence versus entrainment thresholds for the deposita may support this interpretation. One of the geomorphic <br />implications of the elevation limit on flash ft.ooding is a reversal of the usual downstream-fining trend in coarse channel sediments. <br /> <br />1. Introduction <br /> <br />The effect of floods on channel morphology and <br />sediment transport has been a subject of continuing <br />inlerest since the pioneering studies of Wolman and <br />Miller (1960) and Wolman and Gerson (1978), These <br />studies noted the imponance of floods on channel mor- <br />phology in basins with high flow variability or resistant <br />channel boundaries. Subsequent studies have <br />attempted to "quantify these relations (Gupta. 1975. <br />1988; Baker, 1984; Baker and Pickup, 1987; Miller, <br />1990; Wahl, 1992). This paper examines the effecI of <br />spatially disjunct rainfall-induced flash flooding on <br /> <br />1 Present address: floodplain Administrator. City of Ft. Collins. <br />P.O. Box 580. Fl. Collins, CO 80522. USA. <br /> <br />0169.555X/95/$09,50@ 1995 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved <br />SSDIO 169.5S5 XO 169.555X (95) 00037.2 <br /> <br />~- <br /> <br />coarse-sediment deposition in a high-gradient channel <br />of the Colorado Rocky Mounlains. <br />The Colorado Rocky Mounlains are represenlalive <br />of many mounlainous areas of the world in thai flood <br />magnitude-frequency relalions are difficult to estimale <br />as a result of limited knowledge of flood hydromete- <br />orology. Rocky Mountain flood hydrometeorology is <br />poorly understood because of the complex meteoro- <br />logic condilions in mountainous areas, the sparsily and <br />shan duralion of precipitation and discharge records, <br />and the mixed population of floods resulting from either <br />rain.on-snow. snowmell. or rainfall (Jarrell. 1987. <br />1990). <br />. Of the three types of floods in the Colorado Rockies, <br />intense rainfall floods are the most catastrophic. They <br />are characterized by a rapid increase in river stage. over <br /> <br />Journal: GEOMOR Article: 368 <br /> <br />II III \ \ 1\ \ IIIII \11 ~'IIlIII\"II' II' <br />