My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04263
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04263
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:45:45 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:30:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Design of Open Channels
Date
10/1/1977
Prepared By
USDA Soil Conservation Service
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
256
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />3-13 <br /> <br />In the process of investigation, the geologist should bear in mind that <br />one part of a stream bank may be more subject to erosion than another <br />due to differences in the hydraulic stresses that are exerted by the' <br />flow. These stresses are greatest on the bed, on the outside of bends, <br />and along the toe of the banks. Greater emphasis in logging, sampling <br />and testing should be used in searching for and identifying by thick- <br />ness and location any easily erodible stratigraphic units from midbank <br />to the invert level of the proposed channel. A bank is only as <br />resistant as its weakest segment, particularly if this segment is low <br />in the bank. <br /> <br />Determining the Sample Types to be Obtained <br /> <br />Prior to the detailed investigations, the geologist and engineer have <br />made a tentative decision as to whether data from undisturbed and <br />disturbed samples are to be obtained and the best means for obtaining <br />them. Each stratigraphic unit observed in an undisturbed condition is <br />evaluated before the decision is made as to the type of sampling to be <br />done. It is a good rule to obtain undisturbed samples when in doubt <br />as to whether the unit is characteristically composed of discrete <br />particles or of aggregates that would resist erosion as a mass. The <br />effects of the environment on sediment, once it has accumulated, is <br />discussed in the section on the geomorphology of alluvial deposits. <br />The in-place behavior of materials that resist erosion as a cbherent <br />mass cannot be determined by testing disturbed samples. Hence, <br />undisturbed sample analysis is critically important if the in-place <br />deposits differ in erodibility from that of the individual particles. <br />The Unified Soil Classification System and similar systems do not <br />identify erosion characteristics of an undisturbed coherent soil mass <br />except that soils with a high plasticity index (P.I..) are usually more <br />resistant to erosion than noncoherent soils. Some undisturbed soils <br />with a low P.I. are about as resistant to erosion as those with high <br />P.I., and under certain conditions, material with a high P.I. can be <br />as erodible as one with a low P.I. such as soils that are highly <br />dispersive. Another such condition exists when the soil mass is <br />weakened by a fine network of fractures such as that which may be <br />caused by expansive clays. The fractures mayor may not be filled <br />with dissimilar material. The above would have to be determined by <br />appropriate tests and observations. <br /> <br />Careful selection of investigation tools and procedures for investi- <br />gations are necessary to obtain samples and logs of the natural, undis- <br />turbed in-place materials. Augers, excavation equipment and many <br />laboratory procedures disturb the soils and provide data which result <br />in erroneous interpretations of in-place properties. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.