Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />STUDY PROCEDURE <br /> <br /> <br />The first step toward producing this report was to identify the goals and <br /> <br /> <br />objectives, The consultants interviewed parties affected by the drainage <br /> <br /> <br />and flood control program and found their goals and objectives to be con- <br /> <br /> <br />sistent with the goals of the UD&FCD, <br /> <br />Once the hydrological studies were completed, flood peak water surface <br /> <br /> <br />profiles were computed and plotted to define the flood elevations along <br /> <br /> <br />the present channel, Discharges for the 10-year and lOO-year events under <br /> <br /> <br />future development conditions were used to compute the profiles. The <br /> <br /> <br />basic procedure in determining the floodplain was the HEC-2 backwater pro- <br /> <br /> <br />gram developed by the U,S, Army Corps of Engineers, Manual hydraulic <br /> <br /> <br />calculations were performed to define the water surface profiles in areas <br /> <br /> <br />not readily adaptable to computer analysis, <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Field surveys were conducted to gather information relevant to the physical <br /> <br /> <br />characteristics of the existing drainage basin, The consultants visited <br /> <br /> <br />the drainage basin and inspected the hydrologic and surface characteristics <br /> <br /> <br />in' terms of topography, vegetation, soil, and geology, as well as the char- <br /> <br />acteristics, land use and future development forecasts were provided by the <br /> <br /> <br />cities of Broomfield and Westminster, The results of this data gathering <br /> <br /> <br />process are detailed in this report. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Precipitation information was obtained from Volume II I of the NOAA Atlas <br /> <br /> <br />(Ref, 20) to determine the design rainfall events used for runoff analysis. <br /> <br /> <br />Soils data was provided by the Soil Conservation Service. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The next step was to analyze and evaluate the data that had been gathered. <br /> <br /> <br />The evaluation included development of a hydrologic computer model for flood <br /> <br /> <br />hydrograph generation (Ref, 2), <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Flows based on 2-year, 5-year, 10-year, and 100-year frequency rainfall <br /> <br /> <br />were determined for future basin development using the existing drainage <br /> <br /> <br />system in order to asses the effect of future basin development. As a <br /> <br /> <br />result of this determination, together with other information that was <br /> <br /> <br />gathered, existing and potential problem areas were identified and evaluated, <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Computer modeling indicated that additional future urban development, with- <br /> <br /> <br />out upstream storage, would cause an increase in storm runoff, both in rate <br /> <br /> <br />and volume, On that basis, it is evident that there would be further dete- <br /> <br /> <br />rioration in the natural character of the stream channel. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />