My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04190
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD04190
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:45:34 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:24:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Stream Name
All
Basin
Statewide
Title
Flood Proofing Tests: Test of Materials and Systems for Flood Proofing Structures
Date
8/1/1988
Prepared For
US Army Corps of Engineers
Prepared By
US Army Corps of Engineers
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />PART VII: CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br /> <br />Results of tests performed by WES for the Corps of Engineers National <br />Flood Proofing Committee clearly identifies materials and systems which can be <br />used to protect individual buildings from floodwaters. <br />The evaluation of the flood frequency and the height of water which a <br />building can support is a necessary part of the study of systems and materials <br />to protect buildings from floodwaters. It is better to allow water to enter a <br />building than use flood protection methods that subject the building to water <br />loads that structurally damage or collapse the walls. Flooded buildings may <br />be reusable once they have been cleaned and the water damage repaired. <br />Experimental data were obtained by subjecting three brick-veneer and two <br />concrete-block walls to a static head of water. <br />The test walls which did not have roof rafter and ceiling joist re- <br />straint, such as the end walls of a house, failed at about 2.4 ft of water <br />loading. The brick-veneer wall which did have roof rafter and ceiling joist <br />restraint collapsed at 57 in. of water loading. The collapse was so sudden <br />that persons inside could have been killed. The testing of two houses later <br />demonstrated that the constructed house is stronger than the test walls and <br />can safely withstand about 3 ft of waterhead. <br />As a result of closure and preliminary material tests it was determined <br /> <br />that: <br /> <br />o The common brick-veneer wall leaks excessively. <br /> <br />o The brick-veneer or block wall can be protected against excessive water <br />penetration if it is coated with a material which is thick and durable <br />or is protected by an impermeable material. <br /> <br />. For a closure to be watertight, it must have gasket material and must <br />be bolted at its connection to the sidewalls and bottom. The connec- <br />tions for the closure at the sidewalls and floor must be continuous and <br />sealed securely to the walls and floor. <br /> <br />o Two layers of brick will allow a brick-veneer wall to support greater <br />water depths. <br /> <br />. Seals made by snap connections at the base of a building for membranes <br />which extend up and protect the walls of a building are difficult to <br />make watertight and are difficult to make work and should be used only <br />as permanent installations and where more reliable systems are not <br />applicable. <br /> <br />Sealing materials are only one component of a system to protect buildings <br />from floodwaters but they may be useful in specific situations. The tests on <br />sealing materials showed that: <br /> <br />88 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.