My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04190
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD04190
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:45:34 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:24:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Stream Name
All
Basin
Statewide
Title
Flood Proofing Tests: Test of Materials and Systems for Flood Proofing Structures
Date
8/1/1988
Prepared For
US Army Corps of Engineers
Prepared By
US Army Corps of Engineers
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />could be opened (Figure 67) and the fabric rapidly pulled up on the house and <br />connected to permanently installed snaps (Figure 68). A drainage system was <br />installed at the base of the cutoff barrier (Figure 65) to intercept and drain <br />any underseepage into a sump (Figure 69). It was then pumped outside the pro- <br />tected area (Figure 70). <br />The prototype house was located in Tulsa County, Oklahoma. It was in a <br />Corps of Engineers project area and was subject to removal and salvage. To <br />facilitate testing, the shrubbery and debris were removed from the perimeter. <br />Installation of the system required a trench to be dug beside the footing to a <br />depth of approximately 2 ft. After the digging was completed, the drain sys- <br />tem was installed, as shown in Figure 65. A 4-in. perforated drainpipe was <br />placed at the base behind the protective fabric, and a filter system of rocks <br />was placed over the drainpipe. An adhesive was spread on the house wall at <br />ground level to seal a 2- by 4-in. board to the house. The 2 by 4 was then <br />attached to the house by drilled holes, inserts, and screws. <br />The protective fabric was positioned in the trench and on the house. A <br />1- by 4-in. board was placed against the fabric and attached to the 2 by 4. <br />The storage compartment for the fabric was attached to the 1 by 4. Once the <br />storage compartment had been attached to the fabric and to the house, the <br />backfilling of the trench was begun. The fabric was tightly positioned <br />against the foundation at all times as the backfilling and tamping was accom- <br />plished. The backfill was compacted in 6-in. layers to achieve a density <br />which would minimize the seepage of the floodwaters. Since the test was per- <br />formed about 2 days after compaction of the backfill, the fill did not have <br />time to settle and reduce permeability. It is believed that the early testing <br />of the system caused the seepage to be more severe than would have occurred <br />with a better-compacted backfill. <br />The upper snaps (Figure 68) for attaching the protective fabric to the <br />house at the desired elevation were installed. The top elevation of the pro- <br />tective sheathing should be the depth of flood protection plus 6 in. to 1 ft <br />of freeboard to protect the house from waves caused by boats, wind, etc. (As <br />stated earlier, the maximum depth to which a house or a building should be <br />made resistant to floodwaters is approximately 3 ft.) <br />A backwater valve was installed in the sewage drain line to keep the <br />floodwaters from backing up into the house through the toilet and bathtub. <br />This was accomplished by cutting the 4-in. drain pipe leading from the house <br /> <br />70 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.