My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04190
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD04190
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:45:34 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:24:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Stream Name
All
Basin
Statewide
Title
Flood Proofing Tests: Test of Materials and Systems for Flood Proofing Structures
Date
8/1/1988
Prepared For
US Army Corps of Engineers
Prepared By
US Army Corps of Engineers
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />must be taken in attaching the permanent part of the seal strip to the house. <br />If any adhesive material adhered and stayed in the snap area, it held the <br />expedient snap open and allowed water to enter behind the plastic. <br />It appeared that that corners (Figures 49 and 50) could be sealed easily. <br />The one possibility of water entry might occur in the corner where the snap <br />joined together. To seal this area, silicone caulk was placed under the snap, <br />on the underside of the plastic, and at the intersection of the plastic and <br />snap. This solution seemed entirely logical, but in practice it turned out to <br />be extremely difficult to stop leakage at the corners. <br />As the plastic sheet was pulled and the snap connections made along the <br />walls and around the corners, it was difficult to keep the plastic sheet from <br />wrinkling. The vertical sections would not remain straight and tended to <br />wrinkle. Wrinkles in the plastic under the expedient snaps allowed water to <br />enter and make the system ineffective. <br />In general, the system can be made to work, and with careful attention to <br />details, leaks permitting water to penetrate the walls of a building can be <br />prevented. Water entering under the base of the house can be handled by a <br />sump and pump system to collect and remove any seepage water before it gets <br />into and damages the house. <br />After several failures, this system was tested successfully. <br />Outside corners <br />A bulkhead was constructed to hold water for four tests performed on the <br />outside of the cube. The same problems were encountered in working with the <br />system as described for the inside corners, although the outside corners were <br />easier to work with and the plastic was not as easily wrinkled. <br />A second seal strip was found and tested (Figure 51). Again, there was a <br />small amount of leakage at the corners of the brick cubes in the four tests. <br />When dye (a very effective indicator) was used (Figure 52) to determine the <br />location of the leaks, the corners proved to be the weakest part of the sys- <br />tem. A better way to manage the corners of this system is apparently through <br />the fabrication of a one-piece molded corner strip. <br /> <br />Test Results <br /> <br />The snap-type flood-resistant system can be effective in keeping flood- <br />waters from a home or building if great care is taken in installation. This <br /> <br />61 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.