<br />1998 - Colorado Flood Hazard Mitigation Plan (409)
<br />
<br />. .Colorado Disaster Emergency Act of 1992n
<br />(Part 21 of Article 32, Ule 24, Colorado Revised
<br />statute, 1988 as amended),
<br />
<br />. Govemor's Office - .Colorado Disaster Emer-
<br />gency Act of 1992n {Part 21 of Article 32, Ule 24,
<br />Colorado Revised statute, 1988 as amended states
<br />the govemor, as the executive head of state, has
<br />the inherent responsibility, constttutional and statu-
<br />tory authority, to commtt state and local resources
<br />(personnel, equipment, and finances) for the pur-
<br />pose of ... meeting the dangers to the state and
<br />its people presented by disasters... This responsl-
<br />biltty is exercised through the director, Office of
<br />Emergency Management (OEM), Department of
<br />Local Affairs (DOLA), The Govemor's Disaster
<br />Emergency Council serves as an advisory council
<br />to the govemor and the director, Office of Emer-
<br />gency Management on all matters pertaining to
<br />Declarations of state Disaster Emergencies, and on
<br />the response and recovery activities of state gov-
<br />ernment,
<br />
<br />1.3.3 Local Government
<br />
<br />Local governments play an essential role in imple-
<br />menting effective mttigation, both before and after
<br />disaster events, In a post-disasterenvironrnent, locally
<br />affected areas are also expected to participate in
<br />mitigation evaluation. Local government participation
<br />with federal and state agencies in the Colorado Hazard
<br />Mttigation Team process is crucial, Recommendations
<br />on alleviating or eliminating a repetitive problem often
<br />focus on local assessment as to the cause of damage
<br />and depend on a local applicant for implementation,
<br />
<br />Both OEM and' the Colorado Water Conservation
<br />80ard (CWCB) have suggested communities prepare
<br />a flood hazard mitigation plan for their jurisdiction This
<br />is a logical extension of the mttigation planning pro-
<br />cess initiated on a national scale by the federal gov-
<br />emment, A carefully drafted plan can be an extremely
<br />valuable resource to formulate annual work programs,
<br />budgets and policy positions,
<br />
<br />1.4 Goals and Objectives
<br />
<br />The Colorado Flood Hazard Plan is the cornerstone for
<br />establishing and guiding a statewide effort to reduce or
<br />eliminate the impact on life, property, and the environ-
<br />ment from the flood hazard. The costs of responding
<br />to and recovering from repetitive flooding increases
<br />with each event, However, tt is possible to break the
<br />cycle of recurring damage by evaluating the root cause
<br />and choosing a logical and realistic course of action
<br />from among potential attemative solutions to eliminate
<br />or reduce either the cause or its impact
<br />
<br />The implementation of mttigation measures is chal-
<br />lenging due to addttional costs and assuring cost
<br />effectiveness or the measures, Mttigation measures
<br />
<br />can be difficult to inttiate because of social/economic
<br />and/or polttical opposttions. Perceptions of beneftt vs,
<br />threat diminish greatly as an event fades from thought,
<br />However, mttigation successes can be accomplished
<br />by preparing accurate assessment information regard-
<br />ing hazards and when mitigation is supported by
<br />strong leadership and a cornmttment for posttive
<br />change,
<br />
<br />Govemment officials at all levels must understand that
<br />without proactive mttigation action by all applicabie
<br />govemment agencies the costs associated with a
<br />natural disaster will increase. If no mttigation is done,
<br />the accumulated costs of future disasters will far
<br />exceed the cost of mitigation efforts applied now,
<br />
<br />1.5 Definitions
<br />
<br />The following definttions are offered as a guide toward
<br />better understanding the similartties and subtle differ-
<br />ences between the major concepts discussed in this
<br />plan, all developed to reduce flood damages
<br />(addttional definitions and acronyms are listed in At>
<br />pendix D).
<br />
<br />Hazard Mitigation - A plan to alleviate by softening
<br />and making less severe the effects of a major disaster
<br />or emergency and of future disasters in the affected
<br />areas, including reduction or avoidance. Hazard miti-
<br />gation can red uce the severity of the effects of flood
<br />emergency on people and property by reducing the
<br />cause or occurrence of the hazard; reducing exposure
<br />to the hazard; or reducing the effects through pre-
<br />paredness, response and recovery measures, Hazard
<br />mitigation is a management strategy in which current
<br />actions and expenditures to, reduce the occurrence or
<br />severity of potential flood disaSters are balanced with
<br />potential losses from Mure floods,
<br />
<br />Floodplain Management - A comprehensive ap-
<br />proach to reduce the damaging effects of floods,
<br />preserve and enhance natural values and provide for
<br />optimal use of land and water resources within the
<br />floodplain, Its goal is to strike a balance between the
<br />values obtainable from the use of floodplains and the
<br />potential losses to individuals and society arising from
<br />such use. Various floodplain management strategies
<br />are organized in Chapter 5,
<br />
<br />Dam Safety - A program to inventory, classify and
<br />inspect dams to identify hazardous conditions and
<br />ensure proper maintenance through corrective orders
<br />for the purpose of protecting human life and property,
<br />A dam (including the waters impounded by such dam)
<br />constitutes a threat to human life or property if tt might
<br />be endangered by overtopping, seepage, settlement,
<br />erosion, sediment, cracking, earth movement, earth-
<br />quakes, failure of bulkheads, flash boards, gates on
<br />conduits, or other conditions.
<br />
<br />FUe:~f.pub
<br />
<br />1/26/98 10:05 PM
<br />
<br />Clmpter 1 - 2
<br />
<br />\
<br />
|