Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I) <br />I <br /> <br />3. Flow Separation Structures - Where an irrigation ditch crosses a drainage <br />channel section, a flow separation structure should be provided. The final <br />design of any irrigation ditch or lateral crossing, however, is to be coordi- <br />nated with the irrigation company or ditch owner(s). On grade flumes should <br />be used where feasible to reduce silt and maintenance problems. Where <br />runoff design flows are moderate, culverts that pass runoff beneath canals <br />have been shown. The drawings indicate the locations of proposed ditch <br />crossings, but design of the crossings should occur during the final design <br />stages. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />1\ <br />I' <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I' <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />4. Reinforced Concrete Pipe - Underground concrete pipes have been proposed <br />where on-grade land uses, such as for streets or residences, or safety con- <br />siderations have justified the added expense involved. In addition, the flows <br />in the Middle and Northern Branches of Direct Flow Area 0054 are <br />sufficiently small to allow the use of reinforced concrete pipe to convey <br />flow beneath roadways and certain irrigation ditches. Generally, minimum <br />velocities of 2 feet per second are required to lessen sediment deposition in <br />pipes and manholes. Stilling basins should be included at all outlets to <br />control scour. <br /> <br />5. Check dams - Check dams or check drops are recommended in natural <br />channels to safeguard against erosion by lim i ting eff ecti ve eroded channel <br />slopes to 0.5%. The check dams are usually made from concrete, 2 to 3 feet <br />deep and extending across the channel, constructed by pouring concrete <br />directly into a trench formed by a narrow bucket backhoe. <br /> <br />6. Storm Sewer Inlets - Storm sewer inlets are required at all box culverts, <br />along Cherry Drive in Reach 4, and along Holly Street in the Middle Branch <br />of Direct Flow Area 0054. These inlets should be "Type R" as designated by <br />the Colorado Department of Highways and should be designed using the <br />Standard Curb-Opening Inlet Chart as it appears in the June, 1977 issue of <br />"Flood Hazard News", Reference S. <br /> <br />Right-of-Way <br />Except for existing public right-of-ways along the Holly Street, Riverdale Road and <br />112th Avenue corridors, all of the improvements in Reaches 1 and 2 in Adams County fall <br />totally within private property limits. This necessitates land acquisition to build and have <br /> <br />'1-2 <br /> <br />Reaches. The tributary drainage ways, the Middle and North Branches of Direct Flow Area <br />0054, are not to undergo formal channelization above Riverdale and permanent right-of- <br />way requirements are nominal. However, construction and maintenance easements most <br />likely will be necessary to construct the cut-off walls, flow separation structures, and <br />other minor drainageway improvements recommended in these tributaries. <br /> <br />Above Holly Street, within the City of Thornton in Reaches 3 and 4, the necessary <br />drainage right-of-way either exists or is in the process of being platted over to the City. <br />Existing right-of-way controlled the extent of pond enlargements and led directly to the <br />underground culvert and overflow channel configuration recommended in Reach 3. <br /> <br />Operations and Maintenance Requirements <br /> <br />So that the channel continuously provides the flood protection for which it was <br />designed, regular maintenance of the channel and associated drainageway structures is <br />essential. Consequently, one of the major considerations acknowledged in the design of <br />the flood control plan was the operations and maintenance aspect of the improvements, <br />including the proper inspection and repair of these improvements. Particular attention <br />was given to the following: <br /> <br />1. Erosion Control - The design of the channel minimizes erosion by reducing <br />the channel slope and providing lined sections and drop structures for <br />steeper channel portions. After the channel has been subjected to several <br />storm flows, the erosional tendencies of the channel can be determined, and <br />suitable corrections can be made. Where grass-lined channels are in use, re- <br />seeding may be necessary in some areas to establish a good stand of grass. <br />The use of wild grasses in the channel will minimize the need for irrigation <br />and mowing. Rock riprap or gabion revetments have been shown on the <br />drawings in areas considered to be SUbject to erosion. Additional riprap may <br />be required at drops, transitions, low flow channels, or other such structures <br />to more fully protect the banks and channel bottom. In areas not reinforced <br />with riprap and where erosion appears to be endangering channel structures, <br />riprap or gabion protection should be placed. The check dams placed in the <br />low flow channel area along the steep, unimproved tributaries will reduce <br />potential erosion problems that would result from increased runoff from <br />upstream urbanization. As channel grades seek equilibrium and erosion <br />