Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />. <br />. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Land Use <br /> <br />To estimate the percentage of impervious area in the DFA 0054 Basin, the <br />various land uses for present and future fully developed conditions were plotted from <br />1978 aerial photography, current zoning maps and land use plans of the county and <br />municipality involved. Since the City of Thornton does not project any annexation <br />east of Holly Street, the Adams County Zoning Office indicated that it is unlikely <br />development more dense than the 2.5 acres per unit currently allowed by the <br />Agricultural Zoning of this area would occur. This assumption was therefore <br />incorporated into the percent of impervious area estimates. Percent of impervious <br />area for each subarea was obtained by taking a weighted average of the percent <br />imperviousness of the different land uses in the subarea. <br /> <br />drainage way grades. In the extremely wide portions of the floodplain, the procedure <br />also maintains flow concentration, which with conventional channel routing <br />procedures would be disseminated in channel storage. Lag times were calculated <br />from the velocity estimate computed in the HEC-2 backwater program which was <br />used to determine water surface profiles and floodplain delineations. Routing through <br />existing and proposed detention ponds was completed using the routing and upstream <br />features of the MITCAT catchment simulation model. <br /> <br />Flood Hydrographs <br /> <br />Losses <br /> <br />Selected flood hydrographs for the 100-year flood, future basin conditions, as <br />determined using the CUHP program are shown in Figures III-2 through III-4. The <br />100-year hydrographs for historical basin conditions are also included at Holly Street <br />and East 112th Avenue on Figures 1I1-3 and 1I1-4, respectively. Peak flood flows for <br />the design storms considered in the study have been plotted against the channel <br />reference stationing in the Peak Flood Discharge Curves, Figures III-5, and 1I1-6. <br />Detailed information on the hydrologic analysis is available at the office of the Urban <br />Drainage and Flood Control District. <br /> <br />Subareas were determined from U.S.G.S. mapping and major basin features <br />such as the Colorado Agricultural Canal, Lower Clear Creek Canal, Riverdale Road, <br />Holly Street, and so forth. The future land use map is shown on Sheet 11 of the <br />drawings. <br /> <br />A variable infiltration rate based on Horton's equation was assumed. For <br />future basin conditions, initial and final infiltration rates and the decay coefficient <br />were based on recommendations in the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District's <br />User Manual - CUHP Computer Program. Initial and final infiltration rates under <br />historic conditions were estimated from U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service Soil <br />Surveys for Adams County, with minimum and maximum infiltration rates used to <br />estimate final and initial infiltration rates, respectively. A decay coefficient of <br />.0018 per second was used for both historic and future basin conditions. Maximum <br />depression storage values were obtained from the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria <br />Manual. Uniform values of .4 and .1 inches were used for pervious and impervious <br />retention, respectively, under future conditions and .4 and .05 inches under historic <br />conditions. <br /> <br />Flood Routing <br /> <br />Hydrographs were combined by appropriately lagging upland sub-basin hydro- <br />graphs before temporally summing flow quantities. This procedure neglects channel <br />storage but is reasonable because of small channel sections and unusually steep <br /> <br />ID-3 <br />