Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Objectives <br /> <br />The primary objective of the proposed stLody is collecting "COlOr data for th.. <br />purpose of 1) evaluating ex Isting scour-pr'ediction equations and 2) perhaps <br />developing improved scour-prediction equations. A secondary ovJective i::l to <br />assess alternative methods of scour data collection; onsite measurements are <br />considered a necessity at this time, but aeophysical techniques may prove to <br />be superior in the fUture. Following is a list of specific components of the <br />Objectives for the proposed study. <br /> <br />1. Perfor~ onsite measurements to collect scour data during high- <br />flow events to define the occurrence and extent of local scour, <br />constriction scour, and(or) genera! scour, at (::>number<:=) <br />selected sites. <br /> <br />2. Apply geophysical techniques at lu>allisome<:=} sites at the <br />the beginning of the study to determine past scour depths and <br />near the end of the study to obtain another lIM!asurement of scour <br />depths that occurred during the study perioa. <br /> <br />3. Compare locai scour depths measured onsite with iocal "cour <br />depths estimated using published local scour prediction equatior,s <br />and evaluate the adequacy of those prediction equations. <br /> <br />4. Using regression analyses, and(or) other curve-fitting techniques, <br />attempt to develop Improved scour-prediction equations. D.ta <br />to be anaiyzed wouid not necessarily be rest/'icted to the data <br />collected in this study if similar data could be obtained from <br />compatible scour studies being conducted elsewhere. <br /> <br />5. Compare scour data measured onsite with scour data defined by <br />geophysical techniques and assess onsite measurements versus <br />geophysical techniques with respect to cost, ease of use, safety, <br />accuracy, etc. <br /> <br />, Approach <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />Many recent technical and Journal articles pertainlfig to bridge scour and <br />related topics (Jones 1984; Laursen 1984; MurillO 1986) emphasize the need <br />for onsite measurement of scour at bridges during hign-flow events. Lack 01' <br />confidence in which scour prediction equation(s) to use for a particular set <br />of circumstances has prompted an increased interest in developing data bases <br />that reflect full-scale, prototype field conditions. <br /> <br />A pilot study was conducted by the U. S. Geological Survey (USGS) in coop- <br />eration'with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to develop and test <br />guidelines for onsite measurellM!nts of scour at bridges during high flows <br />(Jarrett and Boyle, 1986). That studt presented two alternative approaches <br />for future ocour studies. The onsite measurement part of this proposed scour <br />study for (:>..>study area<:=] is based upon the "limited approach" described by <br />'. <br /> <br />A-2 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />FI <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />11/ I <br />( <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />( I <br />I <br />