Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />1,,_. <br /> <br />, . <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br />I <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />I <br />1 <br />1 <br />I <br />1 <br /> <br />The following guide is offered for conducting worst case analyses: <br /> <br />Water Surface Elevations <br /> <br />Information may not be available on the water surface elevations of the stream <br />at some bridges. This can be compensated for by using procedures developed by <br />the U.S. Geological Survey for'many states. These procedures provide for <br />estimating depths of flow by using hydrologic area, drainage area, flood <br />frequency and error of estimate. Using these procedures, a conservative depth- <br />discharge relationShip can be determined. This relationship can then be used <br />to develop rough estimates of scour. <br /> <br />Long Term Aggradation and Degradation <br /> <br />Long term stream bed profile changes will usually be difficult to assess. The <br />main information sources are the records and knowledge of bridge inspectors, <br />maintenance personnel, or others familiar with the bridge site and the behavior <br />of the stream and other streams in the general area. If aggradation or <br />degradation is a problem, there will usually be some knowledge of its <br />occurrence in the area. Cross sections of the stream at the bridge site, for <br />example, when taken by bridge inspectors over a periOd of time may indicate a <br />long term trend in the elevation of the stream bed. Field inspections should <br />be made at locations whe~e the streams are known to be active and where <br />significant aggradation/degradation or lateral channel movement is occurring. <br />Further discussion on long term stream bed elevation changes is included in <br />Chapters 2, 3, and 4. Particular attention should be given to bridges at <br />problem sites, as noted earlier in this section. Such bridges should be <br />reviewed in the field. Additional information on conducting field reviews is <br />included in Chapter 6. <br /> <br />Plan Form Changes <br /> <br />Assessing the significance of plan form changes such as the shifting location <br />of meanders, the formation of islands, and the overall pattern of streams, <br />cannot usually be accomplished in the office. Records and photographs of <br />bridge inspectors and maintenance personnel may provide some insight into the <br />nature of the stream for the initial office assessments. Historical aerial <br />photographs of the stream can be extremely valuable in this analysis. <br />Ultimately, an engineering judgement must be made as to whether possible future <br />or existing plan form changes represent a hazard to the bridge, and the extent <br />of field work required to evaluate this condition. <br /> <br />Contraction Scour <br /> <br />Contraction scour may be calculated using the equations in Chapter 4 where the <br />amount of overbank and main channel flow is known or can be estimated. The <br />worst case approach would involve estimating the largest reasonable amount of <br />overbank flow on the floodplain beyond the bridge abutments and then <br />calculating contraction scour on this basis. More detailed analyses are <br />recommended for bridges at problem sites, especially where a large difference <br />in the water surface elevations may exist upstream and downstream of the <br />bridge. <br /> <br />49 <br />