My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04125
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD04125
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:45:23 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:21:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Interim Procedures for Evaluating Scour at Bridges
Date
9/1/1988
Prepared By
Federal Highway Administration
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />l".~ <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />13. Erosion history of the stream. <br /> <br />14. Development history (past, present and future) of the stream and <br />watershed. Collect maps;' photographs, area photographs; interview <br />local residences; check for water research projects planned or <br />contlllllPlated. <br /> <br />15. Sand and gravel mining for stream bed up or downstream fOnD site. <br /> <br />16. Other factors that could affect the bridge. <br /> <br />17. Make a qualitative evaluation of the site with an estimate of the <br />potential of stre.. movement and its effect on the bridge. <br /> <br />STEP 2. ANALYSIS OF LONG TEAM BED ELEVATIOI atM6E <br /> <br />A. Using the information collected in Step 1 above, determine qualitatively <br />the long term trend in the stream elevation over the long term. Where <br />conditions indicate that significant aggradation or degradation is likely, <br />estimate the change in bed elevation over the next 100 years using one or <br />more of the following: <br /> <br />1. available computer programs such as The Corps of Engineers MEt 6; <br /> <br />2. straight line extrapolation of present trends; <br /> <br />3. engineering judgment; and <br /> <br />4. The worst case scenarios, i.e., in the case of the confluence to <br />another stream just downstream of the bridge, assume the design flood <br />would occur with a low the downstream water surface elevation through a <br />qualitative assessment of the joint probability of flood magnitudes and <br />river conditions on the main stream and its tributary. <br /> <br />B. If the stream is aggrading and this condition can be expected to affect the <br />crossing, consider countermeasures including a relocation of the bridge. <br />This should be done taking into account contraction scour. <br /> <br />t. If the stream is degrading then use the change in elevation in the <br />calculations of total scour. <br /> <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.