My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04125
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD04125
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:45:23 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:21:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Interim Procedures for Evaluating Scour at Bridges
Date
9/1/1988
Prepared By
Federal Highway Administration
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />l. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />:1 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I" <br />I <br /> <br />CHAPTER 3 <br />DESIGNIII6 BRIDGES TO RESIST SCOUR <br /> <br />A. DESIGN PHILOSOPHY AND CONCEPTS <br /> <br />Bridges should be designed to withstand the effects of scour from a superflood <br />(a flood exceeding the 100 year flood) without failing. This requires careful <br />evaluation of the hydraulic, structural, and geotechnical aspects of bridge <br />foundation design. <br /> <br />The guidance in this chapter is based on the following concepts. <br /> <br />o The foundation should be designed by an interdisciplinary team of <br />engineers with expertise in hydraulic, geotechnical and structural <br />design. <br /> <br />o Hydraulic studies of bridge sites are a necessary part of the <br />preliminary design of a bridge. These studies should address both the <br />sizing of the waterway area and the designing of the foundations to <br />resist scour. The scope and depth of the analysis should be <br />commensurate with the i.portance of the highway and the consequences of <br />failure. <br /> <br />o Due consideration .ust be given to the limitations and gaps in existing <br />knowledge when using currently available fo~las for esti..ting scour. <br />The designer needs to apply engineering judgment in c~aring results <br />obtained from scour computations with available hydrologic and hydraulic <br />data to achieve a reasonable and prudent design. Such data might <br />include: <br /> <br />a. perfonnance of existing structures during past floods; <br />b. effects of regulation and control of flood discharges; and <br />c. hydrologic characteristics and flood history of the stream and <br />similar streUlS. <br /> <br />o The principles of economic analysis and experience with actual flood <br />damage indicates that it is almost always cost-effective to provide for <br />a foundation that will not fail, even from a very large flood event. <br /> <br />Occasional damage from rare floods to highway approaches can usually be <br />repaired rather quickly in order to restore traffic service. On the other <br />hand, a bridge which collapses or suffers major structural damage from scour <br />can create safety hazards to motorists as well as large social impacts and <br />economic losses over a long period of time. Aside from the costs to the <br />highway agency of replacing/repairing the bridge and constructing and <br />maintaining detours, there can be significant costs to communities or entire <br />regions due to additional travel time and distances on the detours, <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.