My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04125
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD04125
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:45:23 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:21:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Interim Procedures for Evaluating Scour at Bridges
Date
9/1/1988
Prepared By
Federal Highway Administration
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Bridge t <br /> <br />Date <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />'- <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />( I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />EXHIBIT V-B, 2 of 2 <br /> <br />B. Bridge Closure. <br />1. Responsibility for decision. <br />2. Criteria for closure. <br />a. Water surface elevation. <br />b. Measured scour depth. <br />c. Warning signs of bridge failure. <br />3. Duration of closure. <br />4. Detour route. <br />a. Route <br />b. Length: <br />c. Other bridges on detour route. <br />1) Bridge Numbers: <br />2) On same waterway. <br />3) Condition. <br />4) Checked for scour potential. <br />c. Traffic <br />1) ADT: <br />2) Percent of trucks: <br />3) Residential neighborhoods along route. <br />d. Approval of detour plan by appropriate jurisdiction(s). <br />5. Feasibility of setting up detour <br />a. Necessary manpower. <br />b. Availibility of required traffic control equipment. <br /> <br />C. Scour Countermeasures. <br />1. Riprap <br />a. Size, extent and volume. <br />b. Estimated cost. <br />c. Time to design and construct. <br />2. Structural medifications to bridge. <br />a. Redundancy to structure <br />b. Cost <br />c. Timing of design and implementation. <br />3. Increase priority in replacement schedule. <br />4. Other possible countermeasures. <br />a. Piling <br />b. Channel training <br />c. Check dam <br />5. Source of funds. <br /> <br />B-22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.