My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04002
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD04002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:44:58 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:16:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Jefferson
Community
Golden, Jefferson County
Stream Name
Clear Creek
Basin
South Platte
Title
Major Drainageway Plan - Clear Creek: Youngfield Through Golden
Date
2/1/1982
Prepared For
UDFCD
Prepared By
Wright-Mclaughlin Engineers
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ Ill. 7 <br /> <br />VI[I-8 <br /> <br />Post.Flood Activities <br />Notification of State and Federal Ag~nci.es <br />Pr~s ident <br />FederdlDisasterAssistdnceAdministrdtion <br />F~d~ral Emergency Mdndgem~nt Ag~ncy <br />Corps of Engineers <br />United StdteS Geologicdl Survey <br />Gov~rnor <br />UrDdn Drdindge dnd FloOd Control District <br />OllpartmentofHousingdndUrtlanDevelo,.nent <br />State Geologicdl Surv~y <br />relief groups <br /> <br />CHANNEL ALTERNATIVES <br />Chdnnel alterndtives were "valuated only for ReaCh 1, and wer,: considered <br />on Iy in con~unct ion witn br1dge improyement, at Foro Str\l.:t and >/asninglon <br />Av\!nue since th~se urid'ol.es ~,,~ntlally control the amount and d~~th of flooo <br />flow tnrougn tne reach. <br /> <br />Tne "xist ing cnanne I and bridg"s in Reach I nay\! adequat~ ca~ac ity for ap- <br />pro~imately 6,200 cfs, or near ly tn.: 50-year flood flow of 8,000 cf,. An <br />a lternat ive baSda on an improyed 50-year des ign cnann~l was not cons idered <br />because the difference in costs between a 50-yedr and IOO-year design cnann~l <br />tnrougn Reacn 1 u.e minimal aM r~s;dual lOO-year flood damage lo'Oula remain <br />with a ~O.year design. <br /> <br />Th~ Ur~an Dr~inage and FlOOd Contra 1 Oistrict current ly maintains an ar2a <br />wide f load detect ion system ut i 1 izing the GRO w~ather Center. In add it ion, <br />imp1.ementdtionof a flood \oIarning syste<nfor Lena Gulcn i,t!xpected to begin <br />duriny 1132 UMer the comoined participation of the Oistrict, Jeff.erson <br />County, tne CIties of IrInedt Ridye an:l Lakewoad and Consolidated Mutual '4ater <br />Company. Under the proposed system, 4 Situation Information Center (SIC ) for <br />data co llect ion and ana lys is lo'Ould DC establ ished at the GRD '~e4ther Center. <br />Tile ::>IC, ur lIdS~ stat ion, ill the single most cost 1.1 i "am of the flood '~arn1ng <br />system because it incorporates the compJter and data terminal, printer, <br />receiver,mapdiSplaj,radioanddllery.encygenerdtor. <br /> <br />Grass-Lined Cnannel <br />Agrdss_linedchannel maybethernost appealing of tnecnannel alternatiyes <br />becauseof1tsnatural dppearanceand its adaptability to park and recreation <br />schemes. Kawever, due to th.e relatively flat 4:L side slopes of a grass- <br />1 hIed cnanne I, tne requ i reo r ight.of-waj widt" i, 1 aryer than for cha~ne 15 <br />with lined side slopes. <br /> <br />rne City of Golden and Jefferson County can add Clear Creek to th.e sy stemoy <br />buyiny into thll SIC and establishing the necessary rain and stre drngagesand <br />observer , ites. Other features include pr~pdredness plan deve lopment dnd <br />maintenance, public information programs, inStitutional organization and <br />equipment maintenance. <br /> <br />Rock.Lined Cnannel <br />fner<.lCK-llnedcnann,,1 is a struct.ural <llternativewhlch increasestnllexis- <br />t ing Channel capac ity ana reduces flood damages, but requi~es less r\ght_of_ <br />way to an toe grass_lined channel. Slhce tne rOCK.l ined cn<!,mel i~ construct- <br />ed of rock riprap III aced a long the inyert and side slop.es (2~ 1/2: 1 r.ecommend- <br />ed max.) of tile channel it can witnstand higher ve loc i ties and gr~ater de;lths <br />than the grdss-lined channel. <br /> <br />fn" MJ.ster Ordin~ge Plan for Lower Ch~~r Creek (Ref~rcnce 34) included an <br />est irn~t" tor ~s taD 11 snment of a f iouu warP' i rIg sy; t~nl for i.ower ::~ CJr Creek. <br />fnis estirnate was rev1eweo and mOdifieo to include the Clear Creek <br />Youngfield through Golden sludy ared. Since tne costs for establishing d <br />flOOd warning system wou10 re~1ist ;ca11y oe Shdr.ed by the loc~l governlnents <br />within tll" basin, tne cost presentee in tnls study represents theestimat2d <br />)Jart ion of tl1~ total system cost wnich I'/OlJ10 b~ app I iCdb]~ to tne Cle~r Cr.eek <br />_ !ou~gfielo Uwough Golden study area. <br /> <br />structural-lrId11ed Ch~nnel <br />rne structural-walled chdnnel iSdstructural alternativewn;cnincreasesthe <br />existing Ch<lnnel capacity t~ereoy reliuci"g fio"d ..amage:;, ~r." req~~rcs 1~S5 <br />r i<jht~of-woY than eith.er the \lrdss-1 ined or rock.l ineo chdnnel dlternatives. <br />rne s tructura l-wa ll.ed cnanne 1 is constructed wi tn ~ ert i ca 1 concrete 'IIa 11 s <br />with a rOCk-lined invert. fhis CMnnel, like the rOCk-lined channel, ciln be <br />d"s igned for h ign"r ~e 1 oc i t ie5 dnd gre~ter deptns Of f low than th" gras,- <br />1 ined chan~e I. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.