Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br /> <br />"' <br /> <br />plan formulation involves evaluatIon of the alternatives to selaet a <br /> <br />pride. ^ further consideration 1s that if Milliken intends to pave the <br />streets at SOme point in time, the COBt of.. 1888 expensive drainage alter- <br />native now will end up being money wasted. Sediment from upstrea", would still <br />be .. problem in the school yard. <br /> <br />VIII. PLANFORMlJI.,ATION <br /> <br />plan and an ~plBment..tion procedure for that plan. <br /> <br />Plan Selection <br /> <br />weeternFlo",path <br /> <br />Lola Park Tributary - Reach ^ <br />Alternative A2 for the Lola Park Tributary prevents upland runoff from <br />draining through the oenter of town altogether, eliminating the need for .. <br />Reach B alternative. A diversion ditch extending from Josephine Avenue to <br />Dorothy Avenue on the Bouth edge of town intercepts inc~ln9 flow routing it <br />east to the Union Pacific nailroad pond. The pond diacharge rate cannot be <br />increased due to downstream conditions so the detention pond planned as part <br />of the I!:o.stern Flow Path 1nIprove..ents...,uld be enlarged toaoco",odate the Lola <br />parI< drain"g<> load. Sediment from the upstrea", fields would r.."",in in euspen- <br />sion until reaching the detention pond. The cost of thie option is high due <br />mostly to the fact that the s1~.. of the union ,PaciHc Railroad pond would have <br />tobei<lcreasedsixfold. <br />~lternative A3 recontours Lola Park into a detention/s..dimentation pond <br />which feede a storm sewer running under Josephine Avenue to the fire station <br />pond. Lola Park ...,uld not be lost as a public facility. Ths park a~sphera <br />would be r....torod followingconstructlon. Thethirdalternat1v..r..ducesflow <br />ot sediment through town as it WQuld s~ttl~ ln Lola ParI<. All aspecte of <br />~lt..rnati"e A3 would be located (lntirely ..ithin city land or r1ght-of~"..y. It <br />is also th.. least costly On the surface. <br />Alternative A4 calls for curb and gutter and paving on Irene and <br />Josephine Avenuea to accomodate their use as drainage"ays in transporting flow <br />from Lola Park to the fire station pond. As a street paveMent drain..g.. <br />alternative it should be oonsidered in a broad..r scope than the economic <br />~~l~y~i~ ~~~~~~t~~ (r~f~r ~o WA~t~rn Flo" path. ~lt..cnative 4). Aqain. if <br />pave~ str....ts are in Milliken's future. money spent on another alternative no" <br />based si~ply from economic jud9"ment ~uld be wasted. <br /> <br />The selection of an ~prove"ent plan for each drainage way "AS based on <br />the economic ~na11si5 and inherent advantages and disadvantages r..lated to <br />construction. maintenance. and implementation. <br /> <br />Alt..rnative 2 for 101'1.. Westecn Flow path involves intercepting the flow <br />bcanching west of the Milliken El..mentary School at the Quentine Aven~e and <br />BroadStreetint..rsection. ltunoffwaterdropatothreeculv..cts"hichoonv..y <br />flow to s channel west of Quentine Avenue and north to an existing box culv..ct <br />under Highway 60. In the economic Analysis. this is the least expensive solu- <br />tion to the flooding probl..m. Another advantage is that flood wat..cs will be <br />kept off the streets. On the negativ.. sid... Alternative 2 doee not alleviate <br />the sediment deposition pcoblem on the school grounds. Also. the curb- <br />opening-typ.. inlet permits dab~is to qet into th.. sump and if the c..p..city of <br />the e~p and culverts is significantly r..duced. flood wat..r will overtop Sroad <br />Street and inundate th.. ~st sid.. of Quentine Avenue an before. <br />^lternative 3 is 7b peccent more expensive than Alt..rnative 2. This <br />option intercepts runoff from fielde south of toWn in a diversion ditch along <br />the south oodgeof the ..lementary school grounds. The flow is directed under <br />county RIOad 21 to a channel on th......,st side then north und..... County Ro..d 46 <br />3/4 and in to the existing box culvert under R1ghway 60. Incoming sediment <br />would be intercepted along with the runoff. Thie would also reduce erosion <br />problems on the eteep streets north of Broad Street se the eroding flows would <br />~.. ~jv~~t~rl. <br />Alternative 4 provides for construction of curb and gUtter and paving for <br />Quentine Avenue. The street profile would be lowered to accomodate the <br />100-yeac flood disch..rge below the fir~t floor elevation of adjacent housinq. <br />The economic analysis snowed this alternative to be th.. =oat expensive when <br />judqed strictly fr~m a drainage standpoint. Gr..ater benefits from paved <br />str~ets ar.. realized every day in r..duced automotive ....intenance. pollution <br />snd noise abatement. increased public heslt~ and satety. aesthetics. s~d civic <br /> <br />Lola park Tributary ~ Reach B <br />Alternative B2 would route water weet out of the fire station pond to the <br />Jit"h on the south sido of Highway 60. At the t.aure "venue riqht-ot-way ti>e <br />flow i8 redirected north under Highway 60 acrosa the Thompson and Platte Ditch <br />