My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03947
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03947
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:44:49 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:12:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Weld
Community
Milliken
Stream Name
Local Drainage
Basin
South Platte
Title
Floodplain Information Report
Date
10/1/1982
Prepared For
Milliken
Prepared By
Simons Li & Associates Inc.
Contract/PO #
&&
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />" <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />2. ^dequacy of ~tural detentIon and conveyance. <br /> <br />I <br />, <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />, <br />, <br />i <br /> <br />finAd ~ a narrow channel or only wndeveloped land is inundated this alter- <br />naU"" is attracti"e. In Milliken, however, such is not the CAse. The <br />flooding Is ~ide"pread over developed urban areae. Legislation, fLood <br />insurance, or floodproofing will not reduce the "Ktent of flooding. ~lso, <br />indlrecto<)sts.."sociatedwlthlegls1at1on, non_developabLe pro perty, and <br />future flooding ..rise. Flood plain zoning is recommended in proposed deten- <br />tion pond areas ..""oelated with structural improvements. Considering the <br />seriousness of the drainage problems in Milliken, the most practical solution.. <br />will be found among the structural alternatives. <br />l!:ach of the thn'" drainage......"s ero,"...... the 'l'hClllpson and Pl..tte Oitch. <br />Conservative design ~BB~eB the ditch is flo~ing at capacity when runoff <br />waters reach it. ~lternatives which cross the irrigation ditch on the surfece <br />all employ e similer ditch cr08sing<'lesign. The ""rth b4nl<.of the Tho"'pson <br />and Pl~tt(j Pitch opposite the drainage channel would be e"cav~t..d to the nor- <br />mal operating wat(jr surface elevation of the irrigation ditch. In this way, <br />flow in excess of the Thompson end Pl~tte Ditch capacity would spill out to be <br />contained by a drainage structure downstream. The ditch crossings ere all <br />located just upstream of flow constrictions (culverts or bridge openingsl on <br />the irrigation ditch which would improve the efficiency of the crossing. <br />~n essential part of all of these alternatives is regular inspection and <br />maintenance. Theeapacity of the structures involved is hasedonhydraulics <br />whioh ~88utrle specific gr~des ..",1 wloDsl:.ruct..d (;I1l""rI:.1I and channels. If the <br />drainage systems are to function as intended, grades ~st be maintained, <br />cul"ert8 and oI,,,nnels l<ept in good rep.llir =d free of debris and sediment, ~nd <br />the assumed channel vegetation oonditions must be presur"ed. <br />Detailed c'llculations used in de"elOpll'ent o! the alternatives ..pp..ar in <br />theTechnicalM.dendwn. <br /> <br />Vl. ALTERNATIVE IM~ROVEMENT PLANS <br /> <br />Conceptual ~pro~ement plane for the drainageways were formulated to <br />alleviate flood damages in M1111l<en. In the !o....ulation of alternati~e ~~ <br />pro~ement plans the following factors he"e been considered. <br /> <br />1. Long-termre11ef of flood problems. <br /> <br />3. Use of streets for con~eying stor'" ",..ter. <br /> <br />4. Drainage capacity of pevedstreets. <br /> <br />5. Av..ilableright-o!-way. <br /> <br />6. Ease of....intenance andacceos. <br /> <br />7. water quality ~provements. <br /> <br />a. Eroaioncontrol. <br /> <br />9. Safety. <br /> <br />The design criteria utilized to formulate the alternative impro"e",ent <br />plane are those contained in "Drainage Crit..ria and Street Deoign M4nua l!or <br />the TOwn of Milliken, Colorado~ (reference 11) which hao been submitted as <br />p~rt of this project. <br /> <br />lmprovement Alternatives <br />Based on the analysia presented, alternative improvenlent plans were de- <br />veloped for e"ch of the flow ~ths inCluding both reaches of the Lola Park <br />Tributary. All hydraulic design w"s ~s..d on the pr"dicted 100-y....r <br />disch"rge. The "ltern"tives formUlated for each drainageway are independent <br />of thoee developed for any of the other drainageways. ~ such, any option for <br />a given drainage path can be ~tched with any alternati"e solution to another <br />route'a prol>l"""'. 'rhe '>lccep<:ion is the nonstructur~l altern~ti"., (Alt..rnati"" <br />1l for the Ea'ltern ~low ~"th which would add to the Lola parI< Tributary <br />problema. <br />Nonatructural alternati~es (Alternative 1 for each drainageway) involve <br />nonstructural mRSSUree each aA floodproo!ing individual structures, flood <br />insurance, or establishing flood plain zoning regulationB. The nonatructural <br />alterMti""e haw, the ..c1v..nr.ag..of low oonetructlon costa. If new is COn- <br /> <br />w..~t"rn Flow Path <br /> <br />The solution to the erosion and flOOding problems plaguing th.. Weatern <br />Flow path is to provide ~ distinct flow path(sl protected to withstand <br />eroding VQlocit.ea. groaion on Quentine, Pauline, Olive, Norma. and Marjorie <br />~venues can be eliminated by paving the streeta. Three structural alter- <br />natives to eliminate flooding on Quentin.. Avenue follow. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.