Laserfiche WebLink
<br />in which A ~ porosity. Written in finite difference form with a forward <br />difference for q; (7), Eq. 10 becomes <br /> <br />_ 4.t 2 ';+IQ;,+1 - 'iq:; <br />tJ.zi - - . . , ., ... .., .. . ... .., ... . , . ., . . .. (11) <br />1 - ^ '; + 'i+l ',+1 - '; <br />in which j ~ radial (transverse) coordinate index. Eq. 11 provides the <br />changes in channel bed elevation for a time step, tJ./, due to transverse <br />sediment movement. These transverse changes, as well as the longitu- <br />dinal changes, are applied to the stream bed at each time step. Stream <br />bed profile evolution is simulated by repeated iteration along successive <br />time steps. <br /> <br />SAN loRENZO RIVER STUDY <br /> <br />The FLUVIAL-12 model described herein was tested by simulating flow <br />and bed profile changes in the San Lorenzo River (see Figs. 1 and 2), <br />which drains into the Santa Cruz Harbor on the Pacific coast through <br />the Oty of Santa Cruz, California. A field study, sponsored by the San <br />Francisco District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, was made dur- <br />ing the February 1980 flood for the purpose of analyzing river bed scour- <br />fill processes during the flood (23). This river reach, which has several <br />channel bends near the mouth, is protected by riprap on its bank slopes. <br />The lower two-mile reach of the San Lorenzo River was simulated us- <br />ing the mathematical model for the February 1980 flood. Hydrographs <br />for this flood event and tidal variation at the harbor used in the simu- <br />lation are shown in Fig. 3. The 9O-hr flood duration was computed using <br />800 time steps. Initial bed materials in the river varied from very coarse <br />sand (median diameter ~ 1.05 nun) at the upstream end to coarse sand <br />(median diameter ~ 0.64 mm) at the mouth. Sediment load consisted <br />primarily of bed load during the flow period. <br />Selected results obtained from this simulation are shown in Figs. 4-6 <br />for the curved reach where significant river bed changes are predicted. <br />These results are compared with measurements made at the gaging sta- <br />tions (G2-G6 in Fig. 1) on February 19, 1980, around the time of 78.5 <br />hr on the hydrograph. Simulated water surface profiles at the time of <br />the peak flood and at the time of measurement (time ~ 78.5 hr) are <br />shown in Fig. 4(b) with the simulated profile of minimum river bed el- <br />evation at the time of measurement. These results compare favorably <br />with measurements. The simulated river bed profile is closely related to <br />the streamwise variation in the mean flow curvature shown in Fig. 4(c), <br />characterized by an increase in curvature as the flow enters a bend and <br />a decrease in curvature after leaving the bend exit. Upon entering a bend, <br />the rate of increase in flow curvature is more rapid initially and then it <br />slows down gradually. In a long bend, the flow curvature will approach <br />the channel curvature, and thus, the transverse circulation becomes fully <br />developed. Such a condition is predicted at Sections 10, 11, 19 and 22. <br />The transverse flow, as predicted, is not fully developed in other shorter <br />bends where the flow curvature remains less than the channel curva- <br />ture. Upon leaving a bend, the flow curvature decreases following an <br />exponential decay curve, and it persists for a considerable distance <br />downstream, consistent with the experimental findings by Ippen and <br /> <br />649 <br /> <br />27 <br />