My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03929
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03929
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:44:46 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:12:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
Nationwide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Generalized Computer Program Fluvial-12 Mathematical Model for Erodible Channels Users Manual
Date
8/1/1986
Prepared By
Howard H. Chang, Ph.D., P.E.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />when Lake Hodges spilled. Hydrographs of these floods are shown in <br />Fig. 2. Prior to these events, Lake Hodges had not spilled for 26 yr. <br />River Channel Changes.-Significant changes in the river channel were <br />observed after the March, 1978, flood. Channel-bed SCour occurred near <br />borrow pits and notably at the bridge crossing where measurements were <br />made as shown in Fig. 3 for Section 51. Deposition was observed in the <br />borrow pits. With limited flood discharge and duration, these borrow <br />pits were only partially refilled. <br />Major changes in the river channel occurred during the greater Feb- <br />ruary, 1980, flood. These changes included channel-bed aggradation and <br />degradation, width variation, and lateral migration of the channel as <br />described below. These changes were recorded by photographs taken <br />during the flood, by a high water mark at Section 52, and by channel- <br />bed measurements at selected cross sections after the flood as shown in <br />Fig. 3. <br />Major aggradation occurred in the borrow pits as they were largely <br />refiJled after the flood. Major degradation occurred near the borrow pits <br />and at the bridge crossing during the flood. Failure of several bridge <br />piers as shown in Fig. 4 was caused by channel-bed scour, high velocity, <br />and debris accumulation on the piers. <br />Channel-bed aggradation and' degradation were accompanied by <br />changes in channel width. The initial channel width was highly uneven <br />along the reach primarily due to width encroachment by road embank- <br />ments at the bridge crossing. Sand mining also contributed to the initial <br />uneven width variation. As shown in Fig. 3, changes in channel width <br />that occurred during the flood consisted of widening at the bridge cross- <br />ing (Section 51) and other initially narrow sections (Sections 47, 49, 50, <br />57, 58, 59) and reductions in width at initially wide sections, notably at <br /> <br /> <br />FIG. 4.-$an DIeguItO River Near Via de Santa Fa Road on February 21, 1980 <br />(Looking Toward South) <br /> <br />164 <br /> <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.