My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03929
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03929
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:44:46 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:12:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
Nationwide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Generalized Computer Program Fluvial-12 Mathematical Model for Erodible Channels Users Manual
Date
8/1/1986
Prepared By
Howard H. Chang, Ph.D., P.E.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />: dO + g aH + : 1.. (~~)+ g5 _ ~_ q" 0 <br />A dt OS A dS A A2 <br /> <br />(2) <br /> <br />where 0 is the discharge, A is the cross-sectional area of flow, t is the <br />time, s is the curvilinear coordinate along discharge centerline measured <br />fran the upstream entrance, q is lateral inflow rate per unit length, H is <br />the stage or water-surface elevation, and 5 is the energy gradient. The <br />upstream boundary conch tion for water routing is the inflow hydrogrphs and <br />the downstream condi tion is the stage-discharge relation or the base-level <br />variation. Techniques for rn.merical solution of Egs. 1 and 2 are described <br />in Chen (1973) and Fread (1971, 1974), among others. <br /> <br />In a curved channel, the total energy gradient, 5, in Eq. 2 is <br />partitioned into the longitudinal energy gradient, S', and the transverse <br />energy gradient, 5", due to secondary currents, i.e. <br /> <br />5 " 5' + 5" (3) <br /> <br />The 10ngitudimll energy gradient can be. evaluated using any valid flow <br />resistance relationship. If Manning's formula is employed, the roughness <br />coefficient n roust be selected by the modeler. However, if a formula for <br />alluvial bed roughness, e.g., Brownlie's fonnu1a (1983), is used, the <br />roughness coefficient is predicted by the formula. <br /> <br />Method for evaluating the transverse energy gradient by Chang (1983) is <br />used in the model. Because of the streamwise changing curvature, the <br />transverse energy loss varies with the growth and decay of secondary <br />currents along the channel. Analytical relationships pertaining to curved <br />channels are often based upon the mean channel radius, rc' Under the <br />strearnwise changing curvature, the application of such relationships is <br />limi ted to fully-developed transverse flow for which the curvature is <br />defined. 5treamwise variation of transverse flow, over much of the channel <br />length, is characterized by its growth and decay. In order to describe this <br />spatial variation, the mean flow curvature defined as the flow curvature <br />along the discharge centerline is anp10yed. It is assumed that analytical <br />relationships for developed transverse flows are applicable for developing <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.