Laserfiche WebLink
<br />[ 8. <br /> <br />Miscellaneous Impacts and Unknowns. A weight of 15 out of 100 is assigned to this <br />factor. The project benefits are considered separately. <br /> <br />Weight <br />10 <br /> <br />The following table presents a matrix which wa~ prepared in order to evaluate the alternatives. The <br />matrix includes a brief statement related to each of th,e factors discussed above for the entire alternative <br />and key and components. The matrix was presented to the Colorado Water Conservation District, City <br />of Sterling and Logan County for initial ranking. Results of this rartking were then presented at a <br />public forum on January 16, 1997. Input from the public at large was received an added to the tables <br />for the final ranking. <br /> <br />The results of the analysis indicate that Alternative No.5 is the most beneficial project to pursue. This <br />alternative ranked highest among the six alternatives evaluated because it provides a relatively large <br />benefit for the cost. <br /> <br />III-15 <br />