Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2. PROPOSED SOLUTIONS <br /> <br />~D.Wll <br /> <br />Common to each alternative (exc,ept for Alternative No. I the "No Action" Alternative), but not <br />discussed in detail are flood warning systems and maintenance programs. <br /> <br />Alternative Improvements <br /> <br />Based on a review of the existing reports and discussions with the proj ect sponsors arld local citizens, <br />the following improvements were selected for further study. A conceptual design of all of the <br />proposed projects was completed in sufficient detail to detern1ine construction quantities and cost <br />estimates. <br /> <br />Alternative No.1: "No Action" alternative. A series of seven public meetings with land owners and <br />concerned citizens were held between December 1997 and January 1998. This alternative was <br />uniformly not acceptable given the past series of serious flood events and subsequent dmnages. <br /> <br />Alternative No.2: This alternative will restrict the 100..year flood flows from overl1owing into the <br />left overbank floodplain near where the Pawnee Creek crosses HWY 6. Protection would be provided <br />to agricultural lands and the City of Sterling. This alternative was the recommended alternative from <br />the "City of Sterling Drainage and Flood Control Implementation Plan" dated June 1997. This <br />alternative is shown on Figure 8 and consists of 11 system of flood control levees. In general, the levees <br />would follow along the north side of Pawnee Creek beginning upstream of CR. 29 and continuing east <br />to HWY 6. Since the levees would be designed for the lOa-year storm, they would be required to have <br />3 feet of freeboard by FEMA. The existing bridges at HWY 6 would be improved to convey the 100- <br />year discharge under the bridges. For the southbound laJles, the existing concrete bridge would be <br />expanded by adding 4 cells 01'20' wide X 8' tall RCBs to the south ofth,e existing bridge. "The existing <br />timber bridge along the northbound lanes would be replaced. The CDOT currently has plans to replace <br />the timber bridge within the next 3 to 5 years. In the surnmer of 1996, the UPRRlBNRR replaced their <br />bridge located just downstrearn ofHWY 6 for structural rel~>ons. Design of the new railroad bridge was <br />such that the new bridge will ultimately convey the 100-ye.ar peak discharge. Since the proposed <br />bridge improvements would allow more flow downstream of HWY 6, a second system of levees and a <br />floodwall are proposed to confine stormwater downstream of the highway to the lOa-year floodplain of <br />the South Platte River. The estimated project cost of the proposed improvements along Pawnee Creek <br />is $1,135,500. This cost does not include the new bridge at HWY 6 by CDOT or the newly <br />constructed railroad crossing by UPRR. <br /> <br />These proposed improvements would eliminate the Pawnee Creek overflows from draining into the <br />City. The overflows are estimated to be about 5,000 efs during the 100-yem'storm. Eliminating these <br />overflows removes a substantial amount ofland llIld many structures from the floodplain in both Logan <br />County and the City of Sterling. <br /> <br />Alternative No.3. This alternative is a series of upstream flood control reservoirs as presented in the <br />report entitled "Flood Plain Management Study, Pawnee Creek and Logan Creek, Colorado" dated <br />April 1992. This alternative will store flood waters in detention structures in the upper watershed. <br />General location of the reservoirs are shown on Figure 9. <br /> <br />II1-7 <br />